2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-optimal operation by self-optimizing control: from process control to marathon running and business systems

Abstract: The topic of this paper is how to implement optimal decisions in an uncertain world. A study of how this is done in real systems-from the nationwide optimization of the economy by the Central Bank to the optimal use of resources in a single cell-shows that a common approach is to use feedback strategies where selected controlled variables are kept at constant values. For example, in order to optimize the wealth of a country (overall objective), the Central Bank may to attempt to keep the inflation constant (se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two-step approach Joseph (1987) Marlin andHrymak (1997) Two-step approach Joseph (1987) Marlin andHrymak (1997) Identification for optimization Srinivasan and Bonvin (2002) Bias update Forbes and Marline (1994) Constraint adaptation Chachuat , et al (2008) ISOPE Roberts (1979); Tatjewski, P., (2002); Brdys and Tatjewski (2005) Gradient correction Gao andEngell (2005) Marchetti, et al (2009) Self-optimizing Skogestad (2000b); Govatsmark and Skogestad (2005) Extreme seeking Ariyur and Krstic (2003); Guay and Zhang (2003) NCO tracking Francois, et al (2005); Srinivasan, et al(2008) Active constraints tracking Maarleveld and Rijnsdorp (1970 Later, researchers (e.g. Skogestad 2000aSkogestad , 2000bSkogestad , 2004bKariwala 2007) investigated the notion of self-optimizing control. The concept is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Static Setpoint Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-step approach Joseph (1987) Marlin andHrymak (1997) Two-step approach Joseph (1987) Marlin andHrymak (1997) Identification for optimization Srinivasan and Bonvin (2002) Bias update Forbes and Marline (1994) Constraint adaptation Chachuat , et al (2008) ISOPE Roberts (1979); Tatjewski, P., (2002); Brdys and Tatjewski (2005) Gradient correction Gao andEngell (2005) Marchetti, et al (2009) Self-optimizing Skogestad (2000b); Govatsmark and Skogestad (2005) Extreme seeking Ariyur and Krstic (2003); Guay and Zhang (2003) NCO tracking Francois, et al (2005); Srinivasan, et al(2008) Active constraints tracking Maarleveld and Rijnsdorp (1970 Later, researchers (e.g. Skogestad 2000aSkogestad , 2000bSkogestad , 2004bKariwala 2007) investigated the notion of self-optimizing control. The concept is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Static Setpoint Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the control structure (given by successive sequence of the arcs) is given by the nominal solution and if the sequence of arcs is not affected by an uncertainty, NCO can easily be checked at certain points and then they can be pushed towards their satisfaction. This approach is known as NCO-tracking or Self Optimising Control (SOC) and has been introduced by groups of Bonvin [25][26][27] and Skogestad [1,24].…”
Section: Feedback Strategies For Optimal Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of hierarchical control levels is related to the so-called self-optimising control that was presented by Skogestad (2000Skogestad ( , 2004. Generally speaking, for many systems (companies, chemical processes, biological systems, etc) we have available degrees of freedom (decisions), u, that we want to use in order to optimise the system operation.…”
Section: Closed-loop Production-management Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there were no changes in the process environment, there were constant measurable Figure 2. Implementation of the optimal operation of a process with separate layers for optimisation and control (Skogestad, 2004). influences, d, and there were no unmeasurable disturbances, then a suitably fixed setting, u, would solve the (optimal) control on the production level. As this is never true, an appropriate strategy to respond to the perturbations from the environment by readjusting the manipulative inputs (u) is needed.…”
Section: Closed-loop Production-management Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%