2021
DOI: 10.1190/geo2020-0474.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-surface full-waveform inversion in a transmission surface-consistent scheme

Abstract: Land seismic velocity modeling is a difficult task largely related to the description of the near surface complexities. Full waveform inversion is the method of choice for achieving high-resolution velocity mapping but its application to land seismic data faces difficulties related to complex physics, unknown and spatially varying source signatures, and low signal-to-noise ratio in the data. Large parameter variations occur in the near surface at various scales causing severe kinematic and dynamic distortions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before showing, in the next section, a comprehensive test on the Society of Exploration Geophysicists Advanced Modelling arid model (Oristaglio, 2015), we demonstrate the validity of the VSG concept and of the 1.5D LF‐FWI on a simpler test performed on an abstract model showing complex shallow velocity conditions (Colombo et al., 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Before showing, in the next section, a comprehensive test on the Society of Exploration Geophysicists Advanced Modelling arid model (Oristaglio, 2015), we demonstrate the validity of the VSG concept and of the 1.5D LF‐FWI on a simpler test performed on an abstract model showing complex shallow velocity conditions (Colombo et al., 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A detailed explanation of the derivation of the wave equation and forward modelling in the Laplace–Fourier domain is provided in two recent publications (Colombo et al., 2021; Kontakis et al., 2023) such that we report only the main equations in the following discussion. The 1.5D LF‐FWI is implemented for acoustic, isotropic and constant/variable density 1D media using the Helmholtz wave equation (Jensen et al., 2011) that in the Laplace–Fourier domain can be written as []2kz2truep0.33em()boldx,sbadbreak=truef0.33em()boldx,s,$$\begin{equation}\left[ {{\nabla }^{2} - k{{\left( z \right)}}^{2}} \right]\tilde{p}\ \left( {{\bf x},s} \right) = \tilde{f}\ \left( {{\bf x},{s}} \right),\end{equation}$$where boldx=0.33emfalse(x,y,zfalse)${\bf x} = \ ( {x,y,z} )$, s0.33em=0.33emσ+jω$s\ = \ \sigma + j\omega $ is the Laplace–Fourier complex frequency specified by the damping parameter σ and angular frequency ω (with j0.33em=10.33em$j\ = \sqrt { - 1} \ $), truef(boldx,s)$\tilde{f}( {{\bf x},s} )$ is the forcing term, truep(boldx,s)$\tilde{p}( {{\bf x},s} )$ is the modelled pressure wavefield and kfalse(zfalse)$k( z )$ is the wavenumber: k0.33em()zbadbreak=0.33emsc()z,$$\begin{equation}k\ \left( z \right) = \ \frac{s}{{c\left( z \right)}},\end{equation}$$…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The method is part of a larger near-surface related processing framework and has been applied to field data [33], showing good correspondence of the produced velocity model features with results obtained from helicopter-borne time-domain electromagnetic data [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%