2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00012-003-1830-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-unanimity is decomposable

Abstract: In the interpretability lattice, the varieties possessing a near unaninimity term constitute a filter. It is shown that this filter is the proper intersection of two larger filters. One of these two filters is shown to be modular.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown by Garcia and Taylor [5] that the filter of congruence distributive varieties is the proper intersection of larger filters. A similar result holds for the filter of all varieties with a near-unanimity operation [8].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…It was shown by Garcia and Taylor [5] that the filter of congruence distributive varieties is the proper intersection of larger filters. A similar result holds for the filter of all varieties with a near-unanimity operation [8].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The present author has shown in [16] that a similar result holds for the filter of all varieties with a near-unanimity operation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Except for the penultimate line, the argument is identical with [30,Theorem 3.19]. Compare also Remark 3.3: from another point of view, the proof of Proposition 5.1 exploits the fact mentioned in 3.3(b) that a variety with an n 1 2 -near-unanimity term has directed Gumm terms; then classical arguments from [11,14,24] can be used in order to get congruence modularity from a sequence of ternary terms.…”
Section: Modularity Levels and More Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…(3) When h is an integer the first part follows from [30,Theorem 3.19]. When h is a half-integer it follows from Proposition 5.1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation