2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-011-0367-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nearest Neighbor Distances on a Circle: Multidimensional Case

Abstract: We study the distances, called spacings, between pairs of neighboring energy levels for the quantum harmonic oscillator. Specifically, we consider all energy levels falling between E and E+1, and study how the spacings between these levels change for various choices of E, particularly when E goes to infinity. Primarily, we study the case in which the spring constant is a badly approximable vector. We first give the proof by Boshernitzan-Dyson that the number of distinct spacings has a uniform bound independent… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was conjectured by Erdös (Geelen and Simpson 1993) that the latter equation should hold whenever 1, α and β are Q-linearly independent. This conjecture was disproved in Bleher et al (2012), where it was established that the set of (α, β) for which sup N ∈N G (α,β) (N , N ) < +∞, although of zero Lebesgue measure, has full Hausdorff dimension. It is an open problem to determine whether there exists a pair (α, β) such that sup N ∈N G (α,β) …”
Section: ( ) Is Closely Related To the Number G (αβ) (M N ) Of Distmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was conjectured by Erdös (Geelen and Simpson 1993) that the latter equation should hold whenever 1, α and β are Q-linearly independent. This conjecture was disproved in Bleher et al (2012), where it was established that the set of (α, β) for which sup N ∈N G (α,β) (N , N ) < +∞, although of zero Lebesgue measure, has full Hausdorff dimension. It is an open problem to determine whether there exists a pair (α, β) such that sup N ∈N G (α,β) …”
Section: ( ) Is Closely Related To the Number G (αβ) (M N ) Of Distmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that, in the special case when d = 1, our proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 can be simplified and, regardless of Diophantine properties, we can obtain uniform bounds for #ξ 1 (r) and #ξ 2 (r). On the other hand we will prove, using a modification of an argument from [2], that for any k and d with d ≥ 2, there is a large collection of subspaces for which the upper bounds in our previous theorems cannot be obtained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…They also give us a convenient mathematical model for producing patterns which occur naturally in physical materials known as quasicrystals [16,17]. The particular problems which we are studying in this paper have direct consequences to understanding the distribution of distances between molecules and patterns in quasicrystals [19], as well as to related problems of understanding the distribution of energy levels in sums of forced harmonic oscillators [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we are firstly interested in a higher dimensional version of the Steinhaus problem, which was previously studied by Geelen and Simpson [17], Fraenkel and Holzman [15], Chevallier [8], Boshernitzan [5,6], Dyson [12], and Bleher, Homma, Ji, Roeder, and Shen [4]. For this problem our goal is twofold: to demonstrate the close connection between the multi-dimensional Steinhaus problem and the Littlewood conjecture, and to show how well known results from ergodic theory on the space of unimodular lattices in R d can be used to shed new light on a question of Erdős as stated by Geelen and Simpson [17,Section 4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%