2015
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.140232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nearest-neighbour clusters as a novel technique for assessing group associations

Abstract: When all the individuals in a social group can be easily identified, one of the simplest measures of social interaction that can be recorded is nearest-neighbour identity. Many field studies use sequential scan samples of groups to build up association metrics using these nearest-neighbour identities. Here, I describe a simple technique for identifying clusters of associated individuals within groups that uses nearest-neighbour identity data. Using computer-generated datasets with known associations, I demonst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A blink was defined as a rapid full closure of the eye as sketched in Figure 1 and could occur regardless of head position. Group size was arbitrarily defined as the number of individuals aggregated no more than five body lengths away from at least one member of the group containing the focal deer, meaning a measured group was composed of individuals associated by a chain rule of association (see Rands (2015) for discussion of defining groups by associated neighbors within arbitrary distances). Before starting any set of observations, the observers waited 10 min at the site to habituate the deer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A blink was defined as a rapid full closure of the eye as sketched in Figure 1 and could occur regardless of head position. Group size was arbitrarily defined as the number of individuals aggregated no more than five body lengths away from at least one member of the group containing the focal deer, meaning a measured group was composed of individuals associated by a chain rule of association (see Rands (2015) for discussion of defining groups by associated neighbors within arbitrary distances). Before starting any set of observations, the observers waited 10 min at the site to habituate the deer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance of five body-lengths was chosen following pilot testing, and was used because estimating individual separations beyond this length was logistically difficult for distant gulls. Choosing an arbitrary cut-off like this can have implications for generating larger association matrices 26 , but was sufficient for the simple relationships we consider here. Having identified a group, two observers waited at a maximum of 30 m from the birds for five minutes, to allow for habituation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A blink was defined as a rapid full closure of the eye. Group size was arbitrarily defined as the number of individuals aggregated no more than five body lengths away from at least one member of the group containing the focal deer, meaning a measured group was composed of individuals associated by a chain rule of association (see [37] for discussion of defining groups by associated neighbours within arbitrary distances). Before starting any set of observations, the observers waited 10 minutes at the site to habituate the deer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%