2015
DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2015.999039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nebulization as a delivery method for mAbs in respiratory diseases

Abstract: Overall, the inhalation of mAbs for therapeutic purposes is both appropriate and feasible. The size and structure of the biotherapeutic molecule are important properties to be taken into account when trying to achieve long-term retention. Mesh nebulizers currently appear to be the most appropriate devices for the safe delivery of large amounts of active mAb into the lungs. mAbs should be formulated so as to prevent their degradation and possible immunogenicity. General guidelines can be given for mAb aerosoliz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
112
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
2
112
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to burden of treatment, DPIs give time back to patients when compared to nebulizers, through more rapid administration and delivery, but also additional maintenance time is saved as DPIs do not require as much cleaning as nebulizers . These time‐saving aspects of DPIs are thought to contribute to improved adherence and QoL in patients using these devices . DPIs also prevent loss of the loaded drug upon administration, as compared to most nebulizers .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to burden of treatment, DPIs give time back to patients when compared to nebulizers, through more rapid administration and delivery, but also additional maintenance time is saved as DPIs do not require as much cleaning as nebulizers . These time‐saving aspects of DPIs are thought to contribute to improved adherence and QoL in patients using these devices . DPIs also prevent loss of the loaded drug upon administration, as compared to most nebulizers .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…90 These time-saving aspects of DPIs are thought to contribute to improved adherence and QoL in patients using these devices. 91 DPIs also prevent loss of the loaded drug upon administration, as compared to most nebulizers. 76 Furthermore, there is a limit to the number of capsules constituting a dose and the length of time required for a treatment.…”
Section: Inhalation Drug Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, our antibody showed high efficacy both in prophylaxis and therapy, with reduction of lung viral titers of 100-1,000-fold, as well as reduction of signs and pathology. There is increasing evidence that antibodies can be efficiently delivered through nebulization (22)(23)(24). It was interesting to find that when administered intranasally LCA60 was effective in both mouse models and even when tested at concentrations as low as 0.12 mg/kg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their advantageous biophysical properties have led to the 58 evaluation of several VHHs as therapeutics against common respiratory pathogens, such as 59 respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (Detalle et al, 2016;Rossey et al, 2017). The use of VHHs as 60 biologics in the context of a respiratory infection is a particularly attractive application, since the 61 highly stable VHHs can be nebulized and administered via an inhaler directly to the site of 62 infection (Respaud et al, 2015). Moreover, due to their stability after prolonged storage, VHHs 63 could be stockpiled as therapeutic treatment options in case of an epidemic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%