2018
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000010638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nebulized heparin and N-acetylcysteine for smoke inhalational injury

Abstract: Rationale:Every year, ∼40,000 people suffer burn-related injuries in the United States. Despite recent advances, the odds of dying from exposure to fire, flames, or smoke are one in ∼1500. Smoke inhalation causes injury to the airways via a complex physiological process, and the treatment is mainly supportive. Many recent interventions aim to decrease the formation of fibrin casts, the main cause of airway damage in these patients. Among these, treatment with a combination of nebulized heparin and N-acetylcyst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a 2016 meta-analysis provided no convincing evidence for benefit of heparin nebulization in intubated and ventilated ICU patients [149], while others suggest that nebulized heparin, possibly in combination with mucolytics such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC) may be beneficial in reducing mechanical ventilation duration but has no survival benefit in ARDS patients [108]. Heparin combined with NAC showed significant improvement in airway edema and a resolution of soot in patients with inhalational smoke-induced lung injury and mild-to-severe lung injury scores [150]. A recent case study described the use of nebulized NAC as a life-saving mucolytic following failed conventional mucolytic therapy [151].…”
Section: Heparin and Mucolyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a 2016 meta-analysis provided no convincing evidence for benefit of heparin nebulization in intubated and ventilated ICU patients [149], while others suggest that nebulized heparin, possibly in combination with mucolytics such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC) may be beneficial in reducing mechanical ventilation duration but has no survival benefit in ARDS patients [108]. Heparin combined with NAC showed significant improvement in airway edema and a resolution of soot in patients with inhalational smoke-induced lung injury and mild-to-severe lung injury scores [150]. A recent case study described the use of nebulized NAC as a life-saving mucolytic following failed conventional mucolytic therapy [151].…”
Section: Heparin and Mucolyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no reports of major (or even minor) even with a maximum 120,000 IU unfractionated heparin per day. [6][7][8] The main reason for the long-time hospital stay of our first case was the high need for O 2 (10 L). So, after informing the patient about nebulized UFH trials, she accepted our suggestion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These trials were all safe and successful somewhat. [6][7][8] Here, we report two cases of post-COVID-19-related disabling respiratory distress conditions that were treated with nebulized unfractionated heparin administration.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This patient was administered NAC as recommended by poison control. NAC has been used successfully in the treatment of acetaminophen overdose, smoke inhalation injury, and burns, among other conditions [ 5 , 8 - 9 ]. NAC exerts its healing effects by acting as an antioxidant as well as an inflammatory mediator, making it a reasonable recommendation for conditions where salvage of damaged or at-risk tissues is necessary [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%