2005
DOI: 10.1157/13074799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Necesidades de información de los médicos de atención primaria: análisis de preguntas y su resolución

Abstract: Restrictions: Hawthorne effect or bias in the person observed and participants stage fright. Applicability: the results of the research will be used to plan the resources needed for doctors to enjoy and put into practice the best scientific knowledge.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ej., dermatología, nutrición, etc.) mediante el uso de la taxonomía desarrollada por Ely et al 2 y traducida y adaptada por González-González et al 3,4 . No se incluyeron aquellas cuestiones verificables mediante la entrevista o la revisión de la historia clínica.…”
Section: Materials Y Métodosunclassified
“…ej., dermatología, nutrición, etc.) mediante el uso de la taxonomía desarrollada por Ely et al 2 y traducida y adaptada por González-González et al 3,4 . No se incluyeron aquellas cuestiones verificables mediante la entrevista o la revisión de la historia clínica.…”
Section: Materials Y Métodosunclassified
“…often less than 10 minutes). On the other hand, the required information by them is stored in many and different sources [3]. Envision yourself in a primary health care consultation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(http://www.aemps.gob.es/). 3 MEDLINE comprises more than 26 million citations (January 2017). 4 Scopus includes more than 60 million records from journals and books (January 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A fundamental bottleneck preventing large-scale automatic reuse of this information is that it is mostly encoded in natural language, i.e. free text written by medical practitioners in EHRs [3]. The traditional approach for knowledge extraction was, until very recently, to prestructure certain EHR systems so that only certain type of information is allowed in certain fields.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%