We have solved a 2.4Å structure of a truncated version of the reverse direction myosin motor, myosin VI, that contains the motor domain and binding sites for two calmodulins. The structure reveals only minor differences in the motor domain as compared to plus-end directed myosins, with the exception of two unique inserts. The first insert is near the nucleotide-binding pocket, and alters the rates of nucleotide association and dissociation. The second unique insert forms an integral part of the myosin VI converter domain along with a calmodulin bound to a previously unseen binding motif within the insert. This serves to redirect the effective "lever arm" of myosin VI, which includes a second calmodulin bound to an "IQ motif," towards the pointed (−) end of the actin filament. This repositioning largely accounts for the reverse directionality of this class of myosin motors. We propose a model incorporating a kinesin-like uncoupling/docking mechanism to fully explain the movements of myosin VI.The myosin superfamily is composed of eighteen classes of molecular motor proteins, the vast majority of which traffic toward the barbed (+) end of actin filaments 1 . Class VI myosins were the first of the superfamily identified to traffic toward the pointed (−) end of the actin filament 2 . They function in a number of critical intracellular processes such as vesicular membrane traffic, cell migration, maintenance of stereocilia and mitosis [3][4][5][6] .The current view of how myosin motors couple ATP hydrolysis and actin binding to movement is known as the lever arm hypothesis 7 . In essence the proposed mechanism is that nucleotide binding, hydrolysis and product release are all coupled to small movements within the myosin motor core. These movements are amplified and transmitted via a region that has been termed the "converter" domain to a lever arm consisting of a target helix and associated light chains/ calmodulins. The lever arm further amplifies the motions of the converter domain into large directed movements. Consistent with the lever arm hypothesis, the stroke size has been shown to be proportional to the lever arm length 8,9,10 . In the absence of actin, ATP hydrolysis occurs, but product release is slow, thus trapping the lever arm in a primed or pre-powerstroke position.Correspondence should be addressed to either: Anne Houdusse, Structural Motility, UMR 144 Institut Curie-CNRS, 26 rue d'ULM, 75248 Paris cedex 05, France,, Anne.Houdusse@curie.fr or H. Lee Sweeney, Dept. of Physiology, University of Penn., A700 Richards Bldg., 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6085, Tel. 215-898-8727, Fax. 215-573-2273, Lsweeney@mail.med.upenn.edu Binding to actin causes release of products, plus-end-directed movement of the lever arm, and force generation concomitant with formation of strong binding between myosin and actin.Perhaps because of their reverse directionality, myosin VI motors have a number of additional unusual features. First, the motor domain itself contains two inserts that are unique within...