2020
DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2020.1779434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Necrogeography and necroscapes: living with the dead

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of deathscape was first introduced by cultural geographers in the 1950s in an attempt to retheorize the relationship between culture and landscape and, specifically, the processes of domination, hegemony, and resistance that are expressed even after death (Kong, 1999: 2). Since then, the concept has had diverse trajectories of application in geography and urban studies, but its presence in archaeological debates is still limited (although, see examples in Dakouri-Hild and Boyd, 2016;Semple and Brookes, 2020). With the advent of postprocessual approaches to landscape (Knapp and Ashmore, 1999;Tilley, 1994), studies of funerary landscapes and architecture began to acknowledge the potent "spatial domains" of death.…”
Section: Deathscapes and Mythologized Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concept of deathscape was first introduced by cultural geographers in the 1950s in an attempt to retheorize the relationship between culture and landscape and, specifically, the processes of domination, hegemony, and resistance that are expressed even after death (Kong, 1999: 2). Since then, the concept has had diverse trajectories of application in geography and urban studies, but its presence in archaeological debates is still limited (although, see examples in Dakouri-Hild and Boyd, 2016;Semple and Brookes, 2020). With the advent of postprocessual approaches to landscape (Knapp and Ashmore, 1999;Tilley, 1994), studies of funerary landscapes and architecture began to acknowledge the potent "spatial domains" of death.…”
Section: Deathscapes and Mythologized Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deathscapes are spaces of deep significance both personal and collective, imbued with experiences, memories, and emotions that are constructed while death is staged. Deathscapes are, hence, a form of physical citation in the landscape (Semple and Brookes, 2020: 4), and the repetition of diverse rituals and funerals makes them multi-temporal loci of cumulative commemoration and memory making (Van Dyke and Alcock, 2003).…”
Section: Deathscapes and Mythologized Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deposition of bodies and body parts in wetland landscapes may be seen as a substantiation of the sacred condition of both the human (and animal, and material) object and the place itself, including the entanglements between them. Within an eschatological framework, the act of ritually depositing any kind or number of components into a sacred space could have symbolically charged not just the landscape but the whole of human experience with agential potential, and mnemonic significance (Semple & Brookes, 2020). Within the context of northern European bog body depositions, a significant difference exists between the deposition of whole bodies and that of body parts.…”
Section: Offerings In Fragments As Symbolic Wholesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mezarlar ve bireysel diğer defin alanlarının kendileri peyzajda yer bulan fiziksel atıf biçimleridir ve bu alanlar birçok ritüelle mekânda değişikliklere yol açabilir. Aynı şekilde mezarlıklar aile soylarını araştırmak, geçmişi anmak ve hatırlamak için ölüden geriye kalan önemli işaretlerdir (Semple & Brookes, 2020). Bir diğer görüşe göre mezarlar peyzajda genişletilmiş bir ritüel biçimi olarak mekâna yansıyan ve bilinçli oluşturulmuş kültürel peyzaj unsurlardır (Francaviglia, 1971, Moen, 2020.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified