2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-368-2520-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nederlandse Benoem Test (NBT) handleiding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2017); Van Ewijk et al (2020). Nevertheless, these subjects had extended language deficit documentation and followed speech-language therapy at the time of participation.…”
Section: High Accuracy Detection Of Post-stroke Aphasiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2017); Van Ewijk et al (2020). Nevertheless, these subjects had extended language deficit documentation and followed speech-language therapy at the time of participation.…”
Section: High Accuracy Detection Of Post-stroke Aphasiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current standard for diagnosing aphasia is based on performance on behavioral language tests, such as the Western Aphasia Battery (Kertesz, 1982), the Token test (de Renzi and Ferrai, 1978) or a picture-naming test (Van Ewijk et al, 2020). Yet, these tests have several disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All aphasia participants were tested in the chronic phase after stroke (time since stroke onset in months (median(range)): 16.1(6-126.1). The aphasia sample was checked for language impairments at the moment of data collection using two standardized diagnostic aphasia tests, i.e., the diagnostic test ScreeLing Visch-Brink et al (2010) and the Dutch picture-naming test (Nederlandse Benoemtest (NBT); Van Ewijk et al (2020), using the same procedure as reported in Kries et al (2022, biorxiv). The ScreeLing was administered on a tablet using the Gorilla Experiment Builder (http://www.gorilla.sc) (Anwyl-Irvine et al, 2020).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naming test. We administered a separate test to asses naming abilities in aphasia, namely the Dutch picture-naming test (Nederlandse Benoem Test) (Van Ewijk et al, 2020), as the ScreeLing test does not include a naming subtest. This is a validated picture-naming test with 92 items and a maximum score of 276 points, with lower scores reflecting worse performance.…”
Section: Rise Time Testmentioning
confidence: 99%