2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Need for longitudinal studies to assess the real-world effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last result is likely related to GBM AIT referrals and prescribing, and is compatible with the German REACTstudy finding that subjects treated with AIT were seen more frequently by specialists during the first 3-5 follow-up years, than non-treated in the prescription database. [3,15,17] Limitations A limitation of the study was the lack of data on clinical diagnosis of AR and sensitisation status. However, to identify those suffering from AR we restricted our analysis to individuals using INS, which is the classic common effective and specific medication prescribed for AR.…”
Section: Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The last result is likely related to GBM AIT referrals and prescribing, and is compatible with the German REACTstudy finding that subjects treated with AIT were seen more frequently by specialists during the first 3-5 follow-up years, than non-treated in the prescription database. [3,15,17] Limitations A limitation of the study was the lack of data on clinical diagnosis of AR and sensitisation status. However, to identify those suffering from AR we restricted our analysis to individuals using INS, which is the classic common effective and specific medication prescribed for AR.…”
Section: Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical trials, longer follow-up is restricted by resources and patient compliance, [11][12][13][14] whereas longitudinal observational studies are more feasible and can therefore add unique and valuable information about long term effects of AIT. [3,[6][7][8][9][10][15][16][17] Follow-up times up to 15 years after end of therapy have not been studied yet. Using prescription and register data since 1994 for the entire country of Denmark, we therefore studied effectiveness on AR medication use up to 15 years after end of 3 years treatment (18 years of follow-up) in a large, unselected, national patient population treated with GBM AIT, comparing with well-matched controls and also avoiding exclusions e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Kamat et al. focus mainly on AR prescriptions, 4 the REACT-study also reported greater reductions in both reliever and controller asthma prescriptions, which are not available as OTC medications, and concurrently, clinically important outcomes like asthma exacerbations, diagnosis of pneumonia and hospitalisations all favoured the AIT group. 3 …”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…also speculate whether better access to specialist care could improve outcomes for AIT-treated subjects, since AIT is often administered by specialists. 4 The REACT-study did find that subjects treated with AIT were seen more frequently by specialists during the first 3–5 follow-up years. 3 While difference in access to care could lead to improved outcomes, it is also possible that the increased number of specialist visits would in fact disadvantage the AIT group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation