1987
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.35.373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Need for new physics in statistical models of nuclear de-excitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several attempts have been made in the past few years to explain this anomaly. Some of the authors [2,3] argued that the discrepancy was due to the lowering of the emission barriers of the hot nuclei as compared to the fusion barriers for the corresponding relatively 'cold' inverse absorption channels as a result of the excitation energy and angular momentum dependent deformation of the emitting system in the former. On the other hand, there is another group of authors who claim that the anomaly may be well explained by incorporating spin dependent level density in the standard statistical model prescription and emission barriers need not be changed [4,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several attempts have been made in the past few years to explain this anomaly. Some of the authors [2,3] argued that the discrepancy was due to the lowering of the emission barriers of the hot nuclei as compared to the fusion barriers for the corresponding relatively 'cold' inverse absorption channels as a result of the excitation energy and angular momentum dependent deformation of the emitting system in the former. On the other hand, there is another group of authors who claim that the anomaly may be well explained by incorporating spin dependent level density in the standard statistical model prescription and emission barriers need not be changed [4,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that the standard statistical model calculations failed to predict the shape of the evaporated α-particle energy spectra satisfactorily. A large number of experiments have been performed to study this anomaly over a wide range of compound nuclear masses A CN in the range of ∼60-170 [1][2][3][4][5][6], and in all cases it has been found that the average energies of the measured α-particle energy spectra are much lower than the corresponding theoretical predictions. Several attempts have been made in the past few years to explain this anomaly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the analysis of the data we used the computer code GANES developed by La Rana et al [6] and [7]. To our knowledge this is the only available code which allows to calculate particle-particle correlations, and to include the influence of quadrupole deformations of the compound nucleus.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doubts about the correct interpretation of the experimental data came up when the measured energy spectrum of e particles [6] emitted from excited 67Ga nuclei (E* =90 MeV) was compared with calculations [13] of the statistical-model code CASCADE [,14]. In contrast to calculations [-6] performed with GANES [,11], where the experimental data could be reproduced only with the assumption of extreme compound-nucleus deformations, the CASCADE calculation describes the measured e-particle energy spectrum with the assumption of a spherical nuclear shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In several papers [4,[6][7][8] in which proton emission as well as e-particle emission of hot nuclei was measured simultaneously and interpreted with the computer code GANES [-11], nuclear shapes with axis ratios of 1.7 [4] to 2.5 [8] had to be assumed in order to explain the e-particle data. Even much higher deformations (axis ratio up to 3.0 and more) were necessary to describe the proton spectra at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%