2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02322.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Need for validation of clinical decision aids: use of the AST/ALT ratio in predicting cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C

Abstract: These results suggest that an AAR > or =1 may not be as useful for predicting cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C as previously thought, and emphasizes the need for validation of clinical decision aids on independent patient cohorts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35,36 In conclusion, advanced age, elevated serum GGT and AST levels, prolonged prothrombin time and the presence of splenomegaly are independent variables determining severe liver fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,36 In conclusion, advanced age, elevated serum GGT and AST levels, prolonged prothrombin time and the presence of splenomegaly are independent variables determining severe liver fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…''Indirect'' serum markers including simple routine blood tests, such as prothrombin index [19], platelet count [24], and AST/ALT ratio [25][26][27] have also been proposed.…”
Section: Biological Approach: Serum Fibrosis Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several serum markers, and their combination in scores, have been reported as predicting the presence of cirrhosis with a high degree of accuracy. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] However, most of them have been evaluated only in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), and few have been validated. In addition, these markers could be influenced by extrahepatic conditions, and their overall diagnostic value for cirrhosis is less than optimal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%