2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-8327.1994.tb00617.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Needs Assessment Across Disciplines

Abstract: The needs assessment process, as a tool for decision making, continues to enjoy high visibility in the professional literature, especially in the area of training and human resource development. This literature review explores needs assessment in selected disciplines and provides generalizations about its application. Five needs assessment variables guided our survey of the purposes and methods of the needs assessments described in 106 articles in five general areas (applied sciences, education/technology, med… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moseley and Heaney (1994) reviewed 106 articles reporting needs‐assessment efforts across five disciplines (science, education, medicine, business, public services). The goal of this review was to examine how needs‐assessment practice differed based on context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moseley and Heaney (1994) reviewed 106 articles reporting needs‐assessment efforts across five disciplines (science, education, medicine, business, public services). The goal of this review was to examine how needs‐assessment practice differed based on context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors noted several implications for human performance technology (HPT) practitioners (Moseley & Heaney, 1994). In particular, they noted that a wide variety of models for needs assessment exist and that actual practice of needs assessment falls along a continuum from formal to informal, depending on the practice area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation