2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10669-007-9059-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Needs of communications with general public about the potential risk of electromagnetic fields and methods for achieving this goal

Abstract: In the recent years concerns whether exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) from base station antennae can cause adverse health effects are grown. Great attention is paid on risk of EMF exposure to people living in a close proximity of base stations. In this issue, a point of interest is the personnel mounting, adjusting and maintaining base stations. Their working tasks require stay in high EMF levels' conditions. There are only few studies concerning this specific occupational group. The results from our p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This exposure could happen in work environment as well as in home. For some specific work conditions, the assessment of the RF EMF has been performed (Karpowicz and Gryz 2007;Israel et al 2007;Zarjabova and Israel 2007).…”
Section: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This exposure could happen in work environment as well as in home. For some specific work conditions, the assessment of the RF EMF has been performed (Karpowicz and Gryz 2007;Israel et al 2007;Zarjabova and Israel 2007).…”
Section: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kyoto protocol failure, mainly because of the USA and Australia in Fig. 2 Role of science in explanation of new environmental conditions (following Cutlip et al 1999 andZarjabova and with permission) December 2011 went further. No China and India enrolled in this treaty, but Canada, Russia, and Japan declared withdraw from the program designed to save the planet.…”
Section: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%