2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anpede.2019.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Needs of schoolchildren with type 1 diabetes in Extremadura: Family perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a study in Saudi Arabia has shown that students with T1DM have significantly lower academic performance when compared to their healthy classmates 14 . This is similar to other international studies that have compared students with T1DM to their non‐diabetic classmates and their healthy siblings 15‐17 . The academic performance of students complying to intensive diabetes control was better when compared to those students not following intensive diabetes management 17 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Similarly, a study in Saudi Arabia has shown that students with T1DM have significantly lower academic performance when compared to their healthy classmates 14 . This is similar to other international studies that have compared students with T1DM to their non‐diabetic classmates and their healthy siblings 15‐17 . The academic performance of students complying to intensive diabetes control was better when compared to those students not following intensive diabetes management 17 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In another study, 82% of children aged 6 to 9 years were able to interpret blood sugar readings, but only 60% were able to inject insulin, and only 40% were able to determine the dosage and type of insulin [33]. Furthermore, while 56.5% of children aged 6 to 9 years required assistance in administering insulin injections, 94.7% of children aged 10 to 12 years and 97.4% of children aged 13 to 15 years administered their insulin injections independently at school [33]. Children being away at school or at a daycare facility, and subsequent concerns about hypoglycemia, were significantly associated with parental QOL [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study including students aged 6 to 9 years (grades 1 to 3) reported that parents frequently received calls from the school or were requested to attend school, and some parents directly administered their children's insulin at school [32]. In another study, 82% of children aged 6 to 9 years were able to interpret blood sugar readings, but only 60% were able to inject insulin, and only 40% were able to determine the dosage and type of insulin [33]. Furthermore, while 56.5% of children aged 6 to 9 years required assistance in administering insulin injections, 94.7% of children aged 10 to 12 years and 97.4% of children aged 13 to 15 years administered their insulin injections independently at school [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Despite the availability of diabetes-related supplies and equipment, less than half of school personnel had training to administer glucagon injections. 14 Parents presumed that only a small percentage of teachers could recognize hypoglycemia. In addition, parents indicated that the information and training available for teachers and children in schools regarding diabetes was insufficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, parents indicated that the information and training available for teachers and children in schools regarding diabetes was insufficient. 14 Regarding preferred methods for receiving diabetes education, fathers of children newly diagnosed with T1DM in the US, particularly, expressed interest in receiving diabetes education via mobile web technology. Providing online parent-professional communication, peer support, and disease information through web-based patient portals yielded promising results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%