2021
DOI: 10.3390/su132112053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NEET Rural–Urban Ecosystems: The Role of Urban Social Innovation Diffusion in Supporting Sustainable Rural Pathways to Education, Employment, and Training

Abstract: Common themes of EU social policy include: the promotion of employment; improved living and working conditions; the equal treatment of employees; adequate social protection; and capacity building of the European citizenship. However, it is often the case that rural dwellers and, more specifically, rural NEETs, experience higher levels of marginalisation than their urban counterparts. Such marginalisation is evidenced by their exclusion from decision-making, public life, community, and society. These issues are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we also noticed the absence of specific topics that we consider important in light of the European Commission's guidelines and that we expected to find in the literature. There were limited research papers focusing (see Figure 6) on youth cocreation, including community-based service creation, although, for service creation related to more complex target groups, the need for community level and young people as co-producers of the services is proven (Voorberg et al, 2013;Windsor, 2017;Osborne, 2018;Erdogan et al, 2021;Jonsson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we also noticed the absence of specific topics that we consider important in light of the European Commission's guidelines and that we expected to find in the literature. There were limited research papers focusing (see Figure 6) on youth cocreation, including community-based service creation, although, for service creation related to more complex target groups, the need for community level and young people as co-producers of the services is proven (Voorberg et al, 2013;Windsor, 2017;Osborne, 2018;Erdogan et al, 2021;Jonsson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings emphasize the crucial role of targeted financial and policy interventions in supporting youth, particularly in overcoming educational and employment barriers, which are vital for fostering economically stable and inclusive societies. Erdogan et al (2021) discuss the dynamics of rural-urban ecosystems, focusing on how urban social innovation can facilitate sustainable rural pathways to education, employment, and training. The study presents urban innovation as a key driver for rural development, suggesting that the diffusion of innovative educational and employment strategies from urban to rural areas can enhance opportunities and sustainability in rural regions, thereby reducing the rural-urban divide.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Diffusion of social innovation for SUD: Erdogan et al [20] discuss the diffusion of social innovation from urban to rural contexts to help disadvantaged youth. Alterman and Pellach [21] provide a global overview of legal options to ensure access to water, and show impressive evidence of how formal innovations are transferable.…”
Section: Technological Innovation In Sudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contributions to our Special Issue show great moral restraint; the focus is on economic and legal control. An important topic is inclusion, e.g., of NEETs (i.e., persons not in employment, education, or training) [20], or vulnerable groups (such as in Lisbon, [19]). Tan et al [13] state that innovative governance of socio-technical transition, which relies on entrepreneurship, would also need to be supplemented by a (pro-)social dimension.…”
Section: Technological Innovation In Sudmentioning
confidence: 99%