2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nefrectomía parcial laparoscópica: estudio comparativo entre la vía transperitoneal y la vía retroperitoneal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The retroperitoneal approach provides direct access to the perinephric space, without the need for bowel mobilization. The procedure of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has been associated with significant advantages, such as reduced operative time, lower estimated blood loss, and shorter hospitalization compared to the results for the transperitoneal variant of this technique [28]. Another important aspect is the use of continuous two-layer suturing for renorrhaphy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retroperitoneal approach provides direct access to the perinephric space, without the need for bowel mobilization. The procedure of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has been associated with significant advantages, such as reduced operative time, lower estimated blood loss, and shorter hospitalization compared to the results for the transperitoneal variant of this technique [28]. Another important aspect is the use of continuous two-layer suturing for renorrhaphy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%