DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85912-3_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negabent Functions in the Maiorana–McFarland Class

Abstract: Abstract. Boolean functions which are simultaneously bent and negabent are studied. Transformations that leave the bent-negabent property invariant are presented. A construction for infinitely many bentnegabent Boolean functions in 2mn variables (m > 1) and of algebraic degree at most n is described, this being a subclass of the MaioranaMcFarland class of bent functions. Finally it is shown that a bentnegabent function in 2n variables from the Maiorona-McFarland class has algebraic degree at most n − 1.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study results simple proof of the main result in the paper [17] that all the symmetric negabent functions must be affine. -A characterization of some bent-negabent functions in Maiorana-McFarland class is obtained in Section 5, thus complementing some results of [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our study results simple proof of the main result in the paper [17] that all the symmetric negabent functions must be affine. -A characterization of some bent-negabent functions in Maiorana-McFarland class is obtained in Section 5, thus complementing some results of [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Claim (a) follows from Lemma 1 of [19], since (u) . We now show the first identity of (b) (the second is absolutely similar).…”
Section: Properties Of Nega-hadamard Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…their phase representations are eigenvectors of the Walsh-Hadamard transform -such functions are therefore bent. Another direction is to classify and construct Boolean functions that are negabent or bent-negabent (both bent and negabent) [15,16]. We show that a function in ZRM(2, n) can never be both selfdual and negabent.…”
Section: Danielsen and Parkermentioning
confidence: 99%