Negation in Ternate Chabacano

Sippola, Eeva

doi:10.1075/tsl.95.19sip

Cited by 21 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is also commonly noted that the future aspect marker is ay in Zamboanga but di in Ternate and Cavite (both from Spanish ha de; Fernández 2010). In addition, there are differences in the negation patterns between the Manila Bay and Mindanao varieties (Grant 2011, Sippola 2011a, and they have different distributions of indefinite pronouns and related constructions (Sippola 2012). Zamboanga Chabacano also has a number of grammatical particles from Hiligaynon and Cebuano that are not found in the Manila Bay varieties, such as the numerical classifier bilug (Rubino 2012) and the emphatic discourse This is the accepted version of .…”

Section: Current Status and Documentation Of Chabacanomentioning

confidence: 99%

Contact-induced Grammatical Change and Independent Development in the Chabacano Creoles

Sippola

Lesho

2020

Bulletin of Hispanic Studies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines variation and change among three Chabacano varieties. While there has been considerable debate on how these Spanish-lexified creoles formed and how they are related, there has been no comprehensive comparison of their grammatical features. Based within frameworks of contact-induced grammaticalization (Heine & Kuteva 2003, Matras 2011), this paper compares three areas of Cavite, Ternate, and Zamboanga Chabacano grammar: modality, reciprocal marking, and argument marking. While these creoles have typological similarities, they also have substantial differences due to variation in the grammaticalization of elements from Spanish and the different adstrates in each community. These different grammaticalization paths support theories that these varieties developed independently rather than directly from a single ancestor. Historical evidence suggests they developed under different sociohistorical circumstances during different time periods. Factors in their continuing divergence include their geographical distance, language endangerment in Cavite and Ternate, and the presence of Visayan L2 speakers in Zamboanga. Resumen: En este artículo estudiamos la variación y el cambio gramatical en las variedades chabacanas de Cavite, Ternate y Zamboanga. Aunque la formación y las interrelaciones de estas variedades criollas se hayan debatido considerablemente, todavía falta una comparación exhaustiva de sus This is the accepted version of Sippola, E. & Lesho, M. 2020. Contact-induced grammatical change and independent development in the Chabacano creoles to be published in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 97: 103-121. Do not cite without permission. 2 rasgos gramaticales. Basado en marcos de gramaticalización inducida por el contacto (Heine & Kuteva 2003, Matras 2011), este artículo compara la modalidad, la reciprocidad y la marcación de los argumentos en estas tres variedades chabacanas. Si bien estos criollos tienen una notable similitud tipológica, se diferencian sustancialmente en cuanto a la variación en la gramaticalización de los elementos del español y de las diferentes lenguas de adstrato. La evidencia sobre las diferentes vías de gramaticalización apoya la teoría de un desarrollo independiente en vez de un origen común y único. La evidencia histórica sugiere que las variedades se desarrollaron bajo diferentes circunstancias sociohistóricas en diferentes momentos históricos. La distancia geográfica entre las comunidades, el peligro de desaparición en Cavite y Ternate, y la presencia de hablantes de lenguas bisayas que hablan chabacano como L2 en Zamboanga se identifican como los factores que causan la divergencia todavía en curso. This is the accepted version of Sippola, E. & Lesho, M. 2020. Contact-induced grammatical change and independent development in the Chabacano creoles to be published in Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 97: 103-121. Do not cite without permission.

show abstract

Section: Current Status and Documentation Of Chabacanomentioning

confidence: 99%

Contact-induced Grammatical Change and Independent Development in the Chabacano Creoles

Sippola

Lesho

2020

Bulletin of Hispanic Studies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Por otra parte, dispongo de documentos que muestran que a fines del siglo xvii Maragondon experimentó un crecimiento de población muy intenso -en treinta años multiplicó sus tributos por quince-y que era en esa época una zona lingüísticamente compleja, y ello habrá afectado de algún modo a la configuración del ternateño actual. La completa descripción del chabacano de Ternate que nos ha ofrecido recientemente Sippola (2011) hace patentes algunas importantes diferencias con los demás criollos hispano-filipinos, que podrían hallar aquí su explicación.…”

Section: Réplica Del Autorunclassified

A new window into the history of Chabacano

Fernández

Sippola

2017

JPCL

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Theories about the origin of the Spanish-lexified creoles of the Philippines known as Chabacano have been based on scarce historical samples. This article presents two early Chabacano texts that are more than twenty years older than the ones that have been available so far: ‘La Buyera’, from 1859, and ‘Juancho’, from 1860. Based on a comparison with historical and contemporary sources pertaining to Philippine-Spanish contact varieties, the texts are placed in their linguistic and sociohistorical context. A linguistic analysis of the texts reveals a clear pattern of creole features and suggests that there was probably sociolinguistically motivated variation in different settings where the Chabacano varieties emerged. The results of the analysis confirm that Chabacano existed as a crystallized variety by at least the mid-19th century and was not restricted to interactions between servants and Spanish-speaking masters or to commercial contexts. Rather, it was already a language used for social and intimate relations and daily interactions in diverse neighborhoods of Manila.

show abstract

English and Spanish

Inofuentes¹,

Hundt²,

Kabatek³

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This volume compares the evolution and current status of two of the world's major languages, English and Spanish. Parallel chapters trace the emergence of Global English and Spanish and their current status, covering aspects such as language and dialect contact, language typology, norm development in pluricentric languages, and identity construction. Case studies look into the use of English and Spanish on the internet, investigate mixed and alternating lects, as well as ongoing change in Spanish-speaking minorities in the US. The volume thus contributes to current theoretical debates and provides fresh empirical data. While offering an in-depth treatment of the evolution of English and Spanish to the reader, this book introduces the driving factors and the effects of the emergence of world languages in general and is relevant for researchers and students of sociolinguistics, historical linguistics, and typology alike.

show abstract

Negation in Ternate Chabacano

Cited by 21 publications

References 0 publications

Contact-induced Grammatical Change and Independent Development in the Chabacano Creoles

Contact-induced Grammatical Change and Independent Development in the Chabacano Creoles

A new window into the history of Chabacano

English and Spanish

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About