2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative affect intensity influences drinking to cope through facets of emotion dysregulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

8
57
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, extending these findings, prospective investigations have found that emotion dysregulation predicts substance use following residential substance abuse treatment (Axelrod, Perepletchikova, Holtzman, & Sinha, 2011; Berking et al, 2011), and changes in emotion dysregulation account for reductions in risky behaviors across time (Weiss, Tull, & Gratz, in press). Finally, and of particular relevance to the current study, extant research provides support for an indirect relation between negative affect and risky behaviors through emotion dysregulation in civilian samples, such that maladaptive responses to negative affect confer the greatest risk for risky behaviors (Bonn-Miller, Vujanovic, Boden, & Gross, 2011; Gratz, 2006; Veilleux, Skinner, Reese, & Shaver, 2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Further, extending these findings, prospective investigations have found that emotion dysregulation predicts substance use following residential substance abuse treatment (Axelrod, Perepletchikova, Holtzman, & Sinha, 2011; Berking et al, 2011), and changes in emotion dysregulation account for reductions in risky behaviors across time (Weiss, Tull, & Gratz, in press). Finally, and of particular relevance to the current study, extant research provides support for an indirect relation between negative affect and risky behaviors through emotion dysregulation in civilian samples, such that maladaptive responses to negative affect confer the greatest risk for risky behaviors (Bonn-Miller, Vujanovic, Boden, & Gross, 2011; Gratz, 2006; Veilleux, Skinner, Reese, & Shaver, 2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Other studies have found stronger daily stress-reactivity associated with genetic risk (Gunthert et al, 2007) and among individuals who reported childhood trauma (Glaser, van Os, Portegijs, & Myin-Germeys, 2006). It should be noted that Veilleux et al (2014) did not find a between-person association between global, retrospective reports of emotional-reactivity (i.e., the tendency to respond strongly to emotional stimuli) and average levels of DTC motivation. However, retrospective reports of such micro-processes tend not to correlate with more sophisticated approaches that model such processes using close-to-real time reports (Henry, Moffitt, Caspi, Langley, & Silva, 1994; Shiffman, 2000; Todd, Tennen, Carney, Armeli, & Affleck, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For example, results from Veilleux, Skinner, Reese and Shaver’s (2014) cross-sectional study of college students and non-college adults showed that individuals with high DTC motivation levels were more likely to report feeling intense negative emotions and that this association was mediated by a lack of emotional clarity and deficient emotion-regulation strategies. Similarly, Colder (2001) found that individuals high in DTC motivation, but not other drinking motives, showed a stronger positive association between life stress and heightened electrodermal reactivity to a negative mood induction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental health problems, including substance and alcohol misuse, are disproportionately represented amongst homeless populations, when compared to the general population (Scutella, Johnson, Moschion, Tseng, & Wooden, 2012). A cumulative body of evidence demonstrates that maladaptive emotion regulation responses can underlie a range of psychological disorders (Aldao et al, 2010;Campbell-Sills & Hinshaw, 2007;Sher & Grekin, 2007;Veilleux, Skinner, Reese, & Shaver, 2014;Werner & Gross, 2010).…”
Section: Individual Versus Interpersonal Emotion Regulation In the Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cumulative body of evidence demonstrates that these maladaptive responses can underlie a range of psychological disorders, such as depression, substance use, eating disorders, somatoform disorders, and borderline personality disorder (Aldao et al, 2010;Campbell-Sills & Hinshaw, 2007;Sher & Grekin, 2007;Veilleux, Skinner, Reese, & Shaver, 2014;Werner & Gross, 2010). Outside of the clinical literature, emotion regulation has also been found to be a key determinant of occupational effectiveness, work strain, academic success, and general life satisfaction and well-being (Grandey, 2000;Gross, Richards, & John, 2006).…”
Section: Individual Models Of Emotion Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%