2012
DOI: 10.1177/0018720811432307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative Affect Reduces Team Awareness

Abstract: Disentangling stress from mood affords the opportunity to target more specific interventions that better support team awareness and task performance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although direct empirical work for the negative influences of NGAT on team innovation via information elaboration remains missing, a few studies have provided indirect support for our argument. For instance, Pfaff (2012) indicated that the attention-narrowing effects of sad mood associated with individual cognitive functions might demonstrate analog impacts at the team level. Specifically, a shared negative affect may reduce team awareness by focusing team members’ attention on local details rather than the big picture, which either fails to attend to others’ needs or neglects information from other members (Pfaff, 2012), and thus is considered detrimental to team innovation.…”
Section: Ngat and Team Innovation: The Mediating Role Of Information ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although direct empirical work for the negative influences of NGAT on team innovation via information elaboration remains missing, a few studies have provided indirect support for our argument. For instance, Pfaff (2012) indicated that the attention-narrowing effects of sad mood associated with individual cognitive functions might demonstrate analog impacts at the team level. Specifically, a shared negative affect may reduce team awareness by focusing team members’ attention on local details rather than the big picture, which either fails to attend to others’ needs or neglects information from other members (Pfaff, 2012), and thus is considered detrimental to team innovation.…”
Section: Ngat and Team Innovation: The Mediating Role Of Information ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Pfaff (2012) indicated that the attention-narrowing effects of sad mood associated with individual cognitive functions might demonstrate analog impacts at the team level. Specifically, a shared negative affect may reduce team awareness by focusing team members’ attention on local details rather than the big picture, which either fails to attend to others’ needs or neglects information from other members (Pfaff, 2012), and thus is considered detrimental to team innovation. Cole et al (2008) also found that NGAT distracts team members from focusing on job tasks and goal pursuit, thereby resulting in poorer team performance.…”
Section: Ngat and Team Innovation: The Mediating Role Of Information ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that stress increases communication quantity and efficiency. They do, however, underline that frequent requests for information are associated with poorer task performance (Pfaff, 2012). Stress also influences academic performance.…”
Section: Theory Of Stressmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Besides capturing stress variability over time, SSGs enable researchers to capture stress variability between members. Conventional scoring methods used in stress and synchrony research often overlook variance between members (e.g., Pfaff, 2012; Price & LaFiandra, 2017), assume stationary, or require a strong statistical expertise. This method can facilitate qualitative research through stress state labeling and quantitative research through SSG analytics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%