2007
DOI: 10.1002/asmb.679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative binomial version of the Lee–Carter model for mortality forecasting

Abstract: SUMMARYMortality improvements pose a challenge for the planning of public retirement systems as well as for the private life annuities business. For public policy, as well as for the management of financial institutions, it is important to forecast future mortality rates. Standard models for mortality forecasting assume that the force of mortality at age x in calendar year t is of the form exp( x + x t ). The log of the time series of age-specific death rates is thus expressed as the sum of an age-specific com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Poisson log-likelihood approach has been developed in Brouhns et al (2002b), Brouhns et al (2002a) and Renshaw and Haberman (2003) to remedy to some of the drawbacks of the Lee-Carter approach, such as for instance the assumed homoskedasticity of the errors. Cosette et al (2007) use a binomial maximum likelihood, and a negative binomial version of the Lee-Carter model has been developed by Delwarde et al (2007) to take into account the over-dispersion phenomenon.…”
Section: Singular Values Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Poisson log-likelihood approach has been developed in Brouhns et al (2002b), Brouhns et al (2002a) and Renshaw and Haberman (2003) to remedy to some of the drawbacks of the Lee-Carter approach, such as for instance the assumed homoskedasticity of the errors. Cosette et al (2007) use a binomial maximum likelihood, and a negative binomial version of the Lee-Carter model has been developed by Delwarde et al (2007) to take into account the over-dispersion phenomenon.…”
Section: Singular Values Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we found in our preliminary study that the computational gain from marginalising µ xt substantially outweighs the burden of dealing with the more complicated negative binomial likelihood (by comparing the effective number of samples generated per unit time). Note that this model has already been considered by Delwarde et al (2007), but within the classical framework.…”
Section: Negative Binomial Lee-carter (Nblc) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approach also suffers from the issue that the relationship between the expectation, variance and probability function of death data under the model are internally inconsistent (see Li et al (2009)). Delwarde et al (2007) then proposed a direct extension of the Poisson LC model to form the negative binomial LC model (again, they did not consider the construction of prediction intervals). In addition, Li et al (2009) attempted to account for mortality variations by introducing an age-specific latent variable that accounts for heterogeneity of individuals, which upon marginalisation, leads to the negative binomial LC model as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It becomes the dominant model widely used by actuaries, demographers and many other practitioners to model and forecast age-specific mortality. The approach has undergone various extensions and modifications exemplified in the works of Brouhns et al [6], Cairns et al [7], De Jong and Tickle [8], Delwarde et al [9], Hyndman and Shahid Ullah [10] and Mitchell et al [11], in which attentions were given to modification in the estimation of the first equation of the model by retaining the time series method in the second equation. Pedroza [12] highlighted the fact that the prediction interval based on the original LC model only accounts for the error of time series model while ignoring the errors in estimating the parameters and the variance of the error term in the modeling of the first equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%