2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2725-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative dependence in matrix arrangement problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other examples are given by L-statistics (linear combinations of order statistics) with decreasing coefficients, thus also the maximum and (minus) the minimum are Schurconvex. 5 We refer to Marshall et al (2011), Rüschendorf (2013), Boland and Proschan (1988) and Jakobsons and Wang (2016) for further details on the compatibility of rearrangement methods with Schur-convex objective functions.…”
Section: Assumption 1 the Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples are given by L-statistics (linear combinations of order statistics) with decreasing coefficients, thus also the maximum and (minus) the minimum are Schurconvex. 5 We refer to Marshall et al (2011), Rüschendorf (2013), Boland and Proschan (1988) and Jakobsons and Wang (2016) for further details on the compatibility of rearrangement methods with Schur-convex objective functions.…”
Section: Assumption 1 the Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%