Negative dialectics and the critique of economic objectivity

Abstract

This article explores Adorno’s negative dialectics as a critical social theory of economic objectivity. It rejects the conventional view that Adorno does not offer a critique of the economic forms of capitalist society. The article holds that negative dialectics is a dialectics of the social world in the form of the economic object, one that is governed by the movement of economic quantities, that is, real economic abstractions. Negative dialectics refuses to accept the constituted economic categories as categories of economic nature. Instead, the article argues, it amounts to a conceptualized social praxis [begriffene Praxis] of the capitalistically constituted social relations, which manifest themselves in the form of seemingly independent economic categories. Economic nature is a socially constituted nature, which entails the class antagonism in its concept. The article concludes that for negative dialectics the explanation of real economic abstractions lies in the understanding of the class-divided nature of human practice.

From smart to rebel city? Worlding, provincialising and the Barcelona Model

“…For critical comments on information technology, technique and 'objectivity', see Lefebvre (2008: 146-153). In critical theory terms, the instrumental impulse to ontologise the social is to be treated with the utmost suspicion (Bonefeld, 2016;Lefebvre, 2016). 4.…”

“Society maintains itself despite all the catastrophes that may eventuate”: Critical theory, negative totality, and crisis

“…As James Schmidt (), Deborah Cook () and Adorno himself in “Reflections on Class Theory” point out, Adorno never agreed with Pollock's contention that capitalism's crisis tendencies had been overcome . Moreover, as Hans‐Georg Backhaus (, ) and Werner Bonefeld (, ) have shown, Adorno developed an interpretation of the critique of political economy in the 1960s that was distinct from traditional Marxism, and was central to his critical theory of this era.…”

Open Marxism and Critical Theory: Negative Critique and Class as Critical Concept

“…The purpose of critique, then, is neither to discover economic laws nor to define social reality by registering and classifying facts. It does not seek to explicate one economic phenomenon with reference to another, but to comprehend each phenomena as a form, or mode of existence of the actual relations of life (Bonefeld, 2014 and2016). However, whereas for the "new reading of Marx" and for Backhaus in particular, critique is developed from an "anthropological" standpoint with the intention of demystifying economic categories on a human basis (Backhaus, 2005: 28), for Bonefeld the starting point for an ad hominem (see Adorno) critique is "neither economic character nature or anthropology but the 'definite social relations' that manifest themselves in mysterious economy forms" (Bonefeld, 2014:8).…”