2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b10956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative Electron Affinities and Derivative Discontinuity Contribution from a Generalized Gradient Approximation Exchange Functional

Abstract: Two methods to calculate negative electron affinities systematically from ground-state density functional methods are presented. One makes use of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy shift provided by approximate inclusion of derivative discontinuity in the nearly correct asymptotic potential (NCAP) nonempirical, constraint-based generalized gradient approximation exchange functional. The other uses a second-order perturbation calculation of the derivative discontinuity based on the NCAP exchange-cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed geometry relaxations to determine the equilibrium structure of the adsorbed ligands and thus obtain w b . We then extracted the energies of the ligand molecular orbitals with respect to the Ag Fermi energy and applied many-body and image charge corrections to the semilocal DFT values to obtain E b . Further details are provided in the Methods section, and the details related to the calculated E b values are given in Table S2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We performed geometry relaxations to determine the equilibrium structure of the adsorbed ligands and thus obtain w b . We then extracted the energies of the ligand molecular orbitals with respect to the Ag Fermi energy and applied many-body and image charge corrections to the semilocal DFT values to obtain E b . Further details are provided in the Methods section, and the details related to the calculated E b values are given in Table S2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we obtained the correction to the HOMO as the difference between the Delta self-consistent field (ΔSCF) ionization potential and the position of the PBE HOMO energy with respect to the vacuum. We then followed the procedure proposed in ref and took the LUMO correction to be equal and opposite to the HOMO correction, a method which has been found to be reasonably accurate and avoids the difficulties associated with computing electron affinities with ΔSCF. Then, we used a classical image-charge expression to account for the screening response of the Ag to the excited electron, placing the image plane 1 Å above the Ag surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, IP and EA were calculated by using the following equations, respectively. [ 40 ] IP=Enormaln1En, EA=EnEnormaln+1, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a set of 38 molecules proposed in Tozer and De Proft (2005), the resulting MAE is as small as 0.18 eV with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set. Recently, a similar accuracy has been reached by the explicit inclusion of derivative discontinuity in the GGA exchange potential (Carmona-Espíndola et al, 2020). In this section, we extend our calculation to 26 new molecules that are beyond the above mentioned works, and hence expand the test set to a total of 64 molecules.…”
Section: Resonance Energies Of Temporary Anionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The good accuracy was made possible because of the use of the global scaling correction (GSC) (Zheng et al, 2011), which will be introduced later. At the same time, another method has been developed to evaluate the negative EA from the GKS eigenvalue of the neutral ground states (Carmona-Espíndola et al, 2020). Different from GSC, this method is designed to impose the derivative discontinuity of the exact XC potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%