2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative feedback concept in tagging: Ghost tags imperil the long-term monitoring of fishes

Abstract: Wildlife monitoring using passive telemetry has become a robust method for investigating animal migration. With increased use, this method progressively pollutes the environment with technological waste represented by so called ghost tags (PIT tags ending in the environment due to reproductive expulsions, shedding or animal mortality). However, their presence in the environment may lead to failed detections of living individuals. We used tagging data from studies of the asp Leuciscus aspius and the bleak Albur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Movement patterns can be used to discriminate ghost tags (Stout et al ., 2019), although ghost tag displacements can mimic fish movements (Bond et al ., 2019), as ghost tags can be displaced downstream by currents and carcasses can be carried over large distances both upstream and downstream by scavengers (Havn et al ., 2017). In addition, accumulation of ghost tags can decrease the detection efficiency when tracking because of ‘tag collision’ and generate a source of error for future studies (Šmejkal et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Movement patterns can be used to discriminate ghost tags (Stout et al ., 2019), although ghost tag displacements can mimic fish movements (Bond et al ., 2019), as ghost tags can be displaced downstream by currents and carcasses can be carried over large distances both upstream and downstream by scavengers (Havn et al ., 2017). In addition, accumulation of ghost tags can decrease the detection efficiency when tracking because of ‘tag collision’ and generate a source of error for future studies (Šmejkal et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2021, the fish were two years old and will be mature in two to three years. Their detection by passive telemetry arrays during reproductive migration [67,68] may shed more light on the survival among groups and verify the current significance of the data. Assessing survival to adulthood by detecting spawning individuals could therefore be more accurate than the methods used to collect the currently available data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This project is not without limitations and caveats that could be explored in the future. One potential limitation is the presence of ghost tags , or tags that were expelled, shed, or left after fish mortality that could potentially be interpreted as tagged fish (Šmejkal et al 2020 ). To combat the potential effects of ghost tags, we made note of individuals that remained entirely stationary across multiple tracking events and removed those individuals from the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To combat the potential effects of ghost tags, we made note of individuals that remained entirely stationary across multiple tracking events and removed those individuals from the analysis. We also retrieved shed tags from the river as suggested by Šmejkal et al ( 2020 ). A second limitation is that the scope of our study only included relocation events near the site of tagging, which likely biased movement and space use towards stationary fish that used little space (Gowan et al 1994 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%