2016
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative global phosphorus budgets challenge sustainable intensification of grasslands

Abstract: Grasslands provide grass and fodder to sustain the growing need for ruminant meat and milk. Soil nutrients in grasslands are removed through withdrawal in these livestock products and through animal manure that originates from grasslands and is spread in croplands. This leads to loss of soil fertility, because globally most grasslands receive no mineral fertilizer. Here we show that phosphorus (P) inputs (mineral and organic) in global grasslands will have to increase more than fourfold in 2050 relative to 200… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, other aquifer systems can exhibit much shorter timescales of P storage and remobilisation, for example in karst groundwaters, where P storage and remobilisation can occur within the order of a decade . Sattari et al (2016) have proposed that at the global scale, grasslands have a negative P budget because the return of manure and sewage sludge is not sufficient compared to the offtake of food from grassland implying that grassland would not be the site of accumulation. However, the analysis of Sattari et al (2016) did not allow for the increase diversion of human sewage (as is noted in this study); the fact a proportion of the P in sewage sludge that is returned to land most come from industrial products and not from human sewage; and the return P via rendered animal carcasses (even after incineration as is required in the UK).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, other aquifer systems can exhibit much shorter timescales of P storage and remobilisation, for example in karst groundwaters, where P storage and remobilisation can occur within the order of a decade . Sattari et al (2016) have proposed that at the global scale, grasslands have a negative P budget because the return of manure and sewage sludge is not sufficient compared to the offtake of food from grassland implying that grassland would not be the site of accumulation. However, the analysis of Sattari et al (2016) did not allow for the increase diversion of human sewage (as is noted in this study); the fact a proportion of the P in sewage sludge that is returned to land most come from industrial products and not from human sewage; and the return P via rendered animal carcasses (even after incineration as is required in the UK).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the factor related to the pastures degradation, stands out the soil use with high susceptibility to erosion, the excessive grazing, and the inadequate management of soil fertility (Peron and Evangelista 2004;Li et al 2013;Sattari et al 2016). In pastures areas, the fertility management is usually done with low nutrient intake, as well as in systems with one forage specie, or not used in consortium with larger plants, to optimize the nutrient cycling (Alves Filho et al 2003;Calil et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such outcomes are valuable to understand, and they follow on disparities identified in other global assessments of P budgets (e.g., MacDonald et al, 2011). In this example, however, the meta-analysis centered on testing long-term forage production strategies that overcome limits to plant available P in soil, concluding that a fourfold increase in P inputs to the world's grasslands is required (Sattari et al, 2016).…”
Section: Addressing the P Paradox Within The Realities And Nuances Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent assessment by Sattari et al (2016), for instance, drew on global P budgeting combined with continental modeling of soil P cycling to highlight the long-term outcome of using the world's grasslands to meet growing demands for livestock production: declining fertility. Such outcomes are valuable to understand, and they follow on disparities identified in other global assessments of P budgets (e.g., MacDonald et al, 2011).…”
Section: Addressing the P Paradox Within The Realities And Nuances Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%