2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection on the efficacy of classical swine fever vaccine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PRRSV infection at the time of classical swine fever virus vaccination significantly inhibited the host immune response and resulted in vaccination failure after subsequent exposure to classical swine fever virus (7,43). For pseudorabies virus vaccination, although PRRSV infection affected the duration of the T-lymphocyte response, it did not inhibit the efficacy of the vaccine, which was capable of inducing protective immunity (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PRRSV infection at the time of classical swine fever virus vaccination significantly inhibited the host immune response and resulted in vaccination failure after subsequent exposure to classical swine fever virus (7,43). For pseudorabies virus vaccination, although PRRSV infection affected the duration of the T-lymphocyte response, it did not inhibit the efficacy of the vaccine, which was capable of inducing protective immunity (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the NADC. Groups of 3-5 piglets from the same litter were maintained germfree and treated one of three ways: 1) inoculated intranasally with 10 4 TCID 50 PRRSV (where TCID 50 is 50% tissue culture-infective dose); 2) inoculated intranasally with 10 4 TCID 50 SIV; or 3) given a sham inoculum. All inoculations took place on day 7 (0 days postinoculation (dpi)).…”
Section: Animal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control of CSF is based on stamping out policies and/or on vaccination. However, failed immunization against CSF has been reported, mainly due to interference from maternal antibodies and other infections [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%