1968
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.19680270103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative Magnetoresistance in p‐CdSb

Abstract: Negative Magnetoresistance in p-CdSband D. N. NASLEDOV (a)Negative magnetoresistance is observed a t low temperatures in cadmium antimonide crystals with hole concentration 2 6 x 1W6 ~m -~. The results of the investigation of the field, angular and temperature dependences in the temperature range 2.2 to 77 O K of the magneto-resistance of copper, silver, germanium, and tin doped samples with carrier concentrations ranging from to 10l8 cm-3 are described. It is shown that the negative magnetoresistance is relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, C i j and S i j should not depend on the direction of j with respect to the crystallographic axes. From equations (10) and (11), where the subscript i refers also to the direction of j, it can be seen that for N i N c (i = 1, 2) S 13 /S 23 should be equal to (C 13 /C 23 ) 1/2 , which is not fulfilled for our samples. Below we will show that this is connected not to the sensitivity of the corresponding coefficients to the direction of the current (contradicting the theory [15]), but to a relative proximity of the acceptor system in both samples to the MIT, where the ratios of N i /N c are not negligible and N 1 = N 2 .…”
Section: Analysis Of the Experimental Data And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned above, C i j and S i j should not depend on the direction of j with respect to the crystallographic axes. From equations (10) and (11), where the subscript i refers also to the direction of j, it can be seen that for N i N c (i = 1, 2) S 13 /S 23 should be equal to (C 13 /C 23 ) 1/2 , which is not fulfilled for our samples. Below we will show that this is connected not to the sensitivity of the corresponding coefficients to the direction of the current (contradicting the theory [15]), but to a relative proximity of the acceptor system in both samples to the MIT, where the ratios of N i /N c are not negligible and N 1 = N 2 .…”
Section: Analysis Of the Experimental Data And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…According to equations ( 8) and (10) the plots of ln ρ versus B 2 in weak magnetic fields should be linear functions with the slopes independent of T . As follows from figure 3, such behaviour is realized in no.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Experimental Data And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lower panel: dependence of B(j ) c on T/T b (0) for different directions of the magnetic field. The solid lines are calculated with equation(5) and n = 2/3 as described in the text, the dotted lines are to guide the eye.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single crystals of cadmium selenide prepared by vacuum sublimation were used as the source. The CdSe laycrs were deposited on freshly cleaved (110) surfaces of ZnTe crystals prepared in our laboratory [6]. The hole concentration in ZnTe was 1 to 6 x 10l6 cm-b and the Hall mobility was about 100 cm2/Vs at room temperature.…”
Section: Preparation Of Heterojunctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%