2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative masking and the units problem in audition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
18
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
10
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The grand means, averaged across all 10 blocks, for the 2AFC and the SIAM tasks are consistent with reports in the literature (e.g., Florentine, Fastl, & Buus, 1988), with Shepherd and Hautus (2009) reporting thresholds for 1000-Hz 10-ms tones ranging from 14.5 to 23.6 dB SPL. Inspection of Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The grand means, averaged across all 10 blocks, for the 2AFC and the SIAM tasks are consistent with reports in the literature (e.g., Florentine, Fastl, & Buus, 1988), with Shepherd and Hautus (2009) reporting thresholds for 1000-Hz 10-ms tones ranging from 14.5 to 23.6 dB SPL. Inspection of Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In respect to stimulus duration, our 10-ms tones elicited data remarkably similar to the 100-ms tones employed by Pfafflin and Mathews (1962). This parallels findings that suggest that tone duration does not appear to impact the degree of negative masking (Shepherd and Hautus, 2009). Of further interest is a comparison of fixed-signal functions generated using data obtained from a conventional 2AFC task (Figs.…”
Section: A Comparison With Other Datasupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Thus, for fixed-signal functions generated using psychometric functions, there are similarities to negative masking, whereby unit selection affects the interpretation of circathreshold data. The difference between quiet and noise-background conditions has been noted in previous studies investigating negative masking (Hanna et al, 1986;Shepherd and Hautus, 2009), but not the pedestal effect. The pedestal effect is evident using stimuli presented in either noise (Figs.…”
Section: A Comparison With Other Datasupporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations