2017
DOI: 10.1134/s2079978017030013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative photochromism in organic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Donor–acceptor Stenhouse adducts (DASAs, Figure a) were introduced in 2014 and feature important advantages as compared to traditional photoswitches, including visible light responsiveness and negative photochromism . Moreover, their modular architecture allows for a fine‐tuning of properties .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Donor–acceptor Stenhouse adducts (DASAs, Figure a) were introduced in 2014 and feature important advantages as compared to traditional photoswitches, including visible light responsiveness and negative photochromism . Moreover, their modular architecture allows for a fine‐tuning of properties .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Such spatial changes enabled for example the development of an isomer specific cryptand for metal cations by the reversible folding and unfolding of acrownether. [23] The trans!cis isomerization of typical thioindigos is conveniently triggered by green or yellow light,w hereas the reverse process can be initiated by blue light (negative photochromism [24] ). Quantumy ields for both processes (f tc and f ct )r each values close to 50 %i nf avorably substituted derivatives such as 1b, [13] whereas higherv alues are usually precluded by stochastic aspects of the isomerization mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12] Applications differ markedly in the environment the photoswitch is exposed to,b ei td ifferent solvents, [13,14] matrices or surfaces,a nd understanding how ag iven photoswitch behaves in various environments is crucial for its success in any applications.Donor-acceptor Stenhouse adducts (DASAs,F igure 1a) were introduced in 2014 [17,18] and feature important advantages as compared to traditional photoswitches,i ncluding visible light responsiveness [11,19,20] and negative photochromism. [21] Moreover,t heir modular architecture [22] allows for afine-tuning of properties. [23] First-generation DASAs (1 and 2,F igure 1a) [17,18] are based on dialkylamine donors,whereas second-generation DASAs (3) [24,25] employ secondary anilines leading to bathochromically shifted spectra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Donor-acceptor Stenhouse adducts (DASAs,F igure 1a) were introduced in 2014 [17,18] and feature important advantages as compared to traditional photoswitches,i ncluding visible light responsiveness [11,19,20] and negative photochromism. [21] Moreover,t heir modular architecture [22] allows for afine-tuning of properties. [23] First-generation DASAs (1 and 2,F igure 1a) [17,18] are based on dialkylamine donors,whereas second-generation DASAs (3) [24,25] employ secondary anilines leading to bathochromically shifted spectra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%