2017
DOI: 10.1075/slcs.183.07bao
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative raising in Singapore English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I don't know neither) until the nineteenth century, according to studies such as Rullmann (2002) and Jespersen (1917). However, according to Bao & Cao (2017), negative concord has never been a feature of Singapore English, is rare in postcolonial Englishes (Siemund, 2013, p. 179-180), and not found at all in some (van der Auwera (2017: 129-130) explains this as due to the highly educated level of the original input varieties). Thus, in the above case, it can be seen that retentionism may involve the retention of former states of a dialect, and not just archaisms and relics of a bygone era.…”
Section: Hyper-and Hypo-grammaticalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I don't know neither) until the nineteenth century, according to studies such as Rullmann (2002) and Jespersen (1917). However, according to Bao & Cao (2017), negative concord has never been a feature of Singapore English, is rare in postcolonial Englishes (Siemund, 2013, p. 179-180), and not found at all in some (van der Auwera (2017: 129-130) explains this as due to the highly educated level of the original input varieties). Thus, in the above case, it can be seen that retentionism may involve the retention of former states of a dialect, and not just archaisms and relics of a bygone era.…”
Section: Hyper-and Hypo-grammaticalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%