1995
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.69.1.395-402.1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative regulation of the bovine papillomavirus E5, E6, and E7 oncogenes by the viral E1 and E2 genes

Abstract: Papillomaviruses induce benign squamous epithelial lesions that infrequently are associated with uncontrolled growth or malignant conversion. The virus-encoded oncogenes are clearly under negative regulation since papillomaviruses can latently infect cells and since different levels of viral oncogene expression are seen within the layers of differentiating infected epitheliomas. We used bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) to investigate the mechanisms involved in the negative regulation of transformation. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression level of these proteins would certainly depend on the copy number of the viral genome, therefore providing the positive feedback for amplification. The papillomavirus replication proteins E1 and/or E2 have been shown to repress the promoter which is closest to the replication origin and directs E6 expression (31,38,49,58). Therefore, higher levels of the E1 and E2 proteins would reduce the level of E6, which in turn results in the higher level of the active p53 protein capable of suppressing replication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression level of these proteins would certainly depend on the copy number of the viral genome, therefore providing the positive feedback for amplification. The papillomavirus replication proteins E1 and/or E2 have been shown to repress the promoter which is closest to the replication origin and directs E6 expression (31,38,49,58). Therefore, higher levels of the E1 and E2 proteins would reduce the level of E6, which in turn results in the higher level of the active p53 protein capable of suppressing replication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to its transcriptional activation function, under some circumstances, full-length E2 can also repress transcription of certain promoters that control expression of the E6 and E7 transforming genes, such as the HPV16 P 97 and HPV18 P 105 promoters (3,41,56). As a repressor, E2 has been shown to function indirectly in the regulation of cell proliferation and transformation phenotypes (40,62,65). Structural studies of the full-length BPV E2 protein have revealed that the E2 transactivator consists of two functional domains linked by a nonconserved hinged region (reviewed in references 18 and 35).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ideas could also explain the curious finding reported here concerning the requirements for repressor proteins in BPV transformation. While wild-type genomes need at least one form of the repressors (24,64), we found that the A3 genome did not display such a requirement. If repressors are normally required to down regulate the activity of E2, certain mutations in E2 itself that destabilize its activity would suppress this requirement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Study of such a genetic interaction between E2 phosphorylation and the repressors is warranted by the fact that this region of the E2 hinge is also incorporated into the repressor proteins. Furthermore, previously reported observations showed that at least one form of the repressors is required for viral oncogenic transformation of C127 cells (24,64). The A4 and A3 mutations were combined with mutations FIG.…”
Section: Fig 2 Identification Of Phosphorylated Tryptic Fragments Amentioning
confidence: 89%