1987
DOI: 10.2307/1971409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negatively Curved Manifolds, Elliptic Operators, and the Martin Boundary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
242
0
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
242
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is straightforward to see that R(µ) is smooth at the two 'front faces' of the product, ff 1 ×(M 2 ) 2 0 and (M 1 ) 2 0 × ff 2 . This is because the exponents in the expansions of R 1 (µ 1 )R 2 (µ − µ 1 ) at these faces do not depend on µ 1 . It remains to analyze the behaviour at the remaining 'side faces'.…”
Section: Asymptotics Inside the Continuous Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is straightforward to see that R(µ) is smooth at the two 'front faces' of the product, ff 1 ×(M 2 ) 2 0 and (M 1 ) 2 0 × ff 2 . This is because the exponents in the expansions of R 1 (µ 1 )R 2 (µ − µ 1 ) at these faces do not depend on µ 1 . It remains to analyze the behaviour at the remaining 'side faces'.…”
Section: Asymptotics Inside the Continuous Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete description of the Poisson-Furstenberg boundary has been known for the following finitely generated groups (under certain conditions on the decay of the probability measure defining the random walk): discrete subgroups in semi-simple Lie group (Furstenberg [27] for a particular case of an infinitely supported measure, "Furstenberg approximation", Ledrappier [50] for the case of discrete subgroups of SL.d; R/, Kaimanovich [40] for a general class of measures), free groups (Dynkin, Malyutov [18] for simple random walk on standard generators, Derriennic [14] for measures with finite support), more generally for hyperbolic groups (Ancona [1] for measures with finite support, Kaimanovich [40] for measures of finite entropy and with finite logarithmic moments; see also [5]), groups with infinitely many ends (Woess [58] for finitely supported measures, [40] for more general class of measures), the mapping class group (Kaimanovich,Masur [42]), braid groups (Farb,Masur [23]), for wreath products of free groups with finite groups (Karlsson, Woess [47]), Coxeter groups (follows from Karlsson, Margulis [46], see Theorem 6.1 in [45] for an explanation). Sometimes it is easier to identify the boundary for certain nonsymmetric random walks, rather than for symmetric ones.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Let Be An Adapted Measure Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to see that a SRW is a 1/N -NRW with c(x, x − ) = c(x, y) = 1 for (x, y) ∈ E h . Using Theorem 1.1 and a well-known result of Ancona [1,2,44] on uniformly irreducible random walks on hyperbolic graphs, we prove the following theorem (Theorem 5.1) which extends [25,Theorem 4.7] for the Sierpiński graph with the simple random walk. Theorem 1.2.…”
Section: For a Homogenous Ifs {Smentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The following important result is due to Ancona [1,2], and the specific version we use is taken from [44, Theorem 27.1].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%