2023
DOI: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022037432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiated Involvement in Stem Organizations by Students With Minoritized Identities of Sexuality and/or Gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gee (2010) describes social goods as "the stuff of politics" (p. 7), where "who gets what in terms of money, status, power, and acceptance" (p. 7) is always at stake. College STEM students with MIoSG must navigate cisheteronormative D/discourses in order to receive the social goods of inclusion and affirmation in collegiate STEM contexts, as well as broadly across college campuses (Forsythe et al, 2023). constant comparative analysis (CCA; Charmaz, 2014) we found profuse data which illuminates how cisheteronormative D/discourses in collegiate STEM contexts perpetuate power, privilege, and oppression of people with MIoSG.…”
Section: D/discourses Of Power and Miosg Stem Studentsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gee (2010) describes social goods as "the stuff of politics" (p. 7), where "who gets what in terms of money, status, power, and acceptance" (p. 7) is always at stake. College STEM students with MIoSG must navigate cisheteronormative D/discourses in order to receive the social goods of inclusion and affirmation in collegiate STEM contexts, as well as broadly across college campuses (Forsythe et al, 2023). constant comparative analysis (CCA; Charmaz, 2014) we found profuse data which illuminates how cisheteronormative D/discourses in collegiate STEM contexts perpetuate power, privilege, and oppression of people with MIoSG.…”
Section: D/discourses Of Power and Miosg Stem Studentsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Students notice the lack of MIoSG representation in STEM and have to navigate these environments carefully in order to assess whether they can be out or not (Cech and Waidzunas, 2011;Hughes, 2017;Mattheis et al, 2020) and what, if any, protections might be afforded to them by educational policy (Meyer and Quantz, 2021). Additionally, college STEM students with MIoSG who seek affirming spaces through STEM clubs or organizations must navigate the fore fronting and/or backgrounding of multiply marginalized identities as they seek belonging and community, as well as the presence or absence of such spaces, on their campuses (Forsythe et al, 2023).…”
Section: D/discourses Of Power and Miosg Stem Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the benefits, MIoSG students can also face challenges when attempting to become involved in campus organizations, including concerns for safety (Forsythe et al, 2023) or only receiving partial acceptance from their peers or mentors (Marine and Nicolazzo, 2014;Miller & Downey, 2020;Vaccaro & Mena, 2011). For example, Forsythe et al (2023), found that students with MIoSG must make calculated decisions on whether to participate in organizations they may be outed in for fear of harassment by their peers or fear of professional ramifications within their fields. To address these concerns, many campuses have organized identity-specific organizations to help increase students' sense of belonging and persistence through their degrees.…”
Section: Involvement Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific conferences provide opportunities for scientific and professional education, as well as networking that is critical to career growth. However, discrimination based on gender and sexual orientation continues to permeate professional spaces in the sciences, preventing queer and trans scientists from fully engaging in conferences without compartmentalizing or censoring their identities ( 10 13 ). Furthermore, a “just-focus-on-the-science” culture prevalent in these spaces dissuades marginalized groups from vocalizing the issues they face, thus stifling progress toward inclusivity and diversity ( 14 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%