2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00029-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiating environmental agreements: Regional or federal authority?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is in contrast to Eckert () who analyzes a similar constitutional choice in a two‐country setting and argues that both countries might opt for centralization in equilibrium. The reason is that, in her setting, there are no accompanying policy instruments, such as intracountry transfers, available.…”
Section: Constitutional Choicecontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion is in contrast to Eckert () who analyzes a similar constitutional choice in a two‐country setting and argues that both countries might opt for centralization in equilibrium. The reason is that, in her setting, there are no accompanying policy instruments, such as intracountry transfers, available.…”
Section: Constitutional Choicecontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Our paper is also related to the literature on strategic delegation or other strategically chosen actions prior to environmental negotiations (Copeland, ; Hoel, ; Buchholz and Konrad, ; Buchholz and Haslbeck, ; Segendorff, ; Buchholz et al, ; Beccherle and Tirole, ; Harstad, ). In this context, Eckert () analyzes how the decentralization of power within a country might be strategically used to alter the outcome of an IEA. In her framework, putting the federal governments in charge of negotiations can be an equilibrium outcome.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Η περιφερειακή διακυβέρνηση η οποία θέτει ως πρωταρχική της στόχευση τη βιώσιμη ανάπτυξη δύναται να λειτουργήσει θετικά στην πολύπλοκη σχέση μεταξύ οικολογικών και οικονομικών παραγόντων και διαδικασιών (Quaas et al, 2007;Salvati & Zitti, 2008). Ο Eckert (2003) εμβαθύνοντας σε θέματα ταυτόχρονης αύξησης ρυθμών περιφερειακής ανάπτυξης και υψηλών περιβαλλοντικών επιδόσεων, αναφέρει ότι οι διαπραγματεύσεις για περιβαλλοντικά ζητήματα πρέπει να πραγματοποιούνται σε περιφερειακό επίπεδο μεταξύ περιφερειακών κυβερνήσεων. Το υποστηρικτικό έγγραφο του «Ευρώπη 2020» με τίτλο «Περιφέρειες 2020» (Commission of European Communities, 2008) αναπτύσσει τέσσερις απειλές-προκλήσεις για τις ευρωπαϊκές περιφέρειες: το δημογραφικό, την παγκοσμιοποίηση, την κλιματική αλλαγή και την ενεργειακή ασφάλεια και αυτονομία.…”
Section: προβλήματα στην υλοποίηση-συμπεράσματα-προτάσεις πολιτικήςunclassified
“…Regional governance, which sets the environment as a central issue, can contribute to the complexity of the interaction between ecological and economic process (Quaas, Baumgärtner, Becker, Frank, & Müller, 2007, Salvati & Zitti, 2008. In Eckert's research (Eckert, 2003), it is advocated that negotiations on environmental issues must be made at regional level among regional governments because only by doing so can the benefits be maximized. Despite the fact that climate change is discussed at supranational level, its impact is mainly regional or local, and this is the reason why regions are called to play a significant role (Galarraga, Gonzalez-eguino, & Markandya, 2011).…”
Section: The Six Reasons For a Shift In Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%