2018
DOI: 10.1177/0169796x17753001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiating Impossibilities in Community-driven Development in Indonesia

Abstract: This article examines four normative expectations of community-driven development (CDD) programs and their concomitant criticisms from the perspective of community-based volunteers (CBVs). These volunteers compromise on the ideals of CDD to achieve results. Their compromises often become the focus of criticism. In devolving limited control over development resources to the local level, CDD also devolves the responsibility for failure. Based on a case study of a CDD program in Medan, Indonesia, this article arg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, apathy, poor acknowledgement of the needs of the poorest of people, and participation in a social mindset in Indonesia that institutions are good for impoverished children or resigning to administrative status quo in favour of earning incentive payments, all dominate current social work administrative practices. Many authors write about how regional administrators of government welfare initiatives have little interest in the welfare of ordinary people (Hatherell and Welsh, 2017; Jakimow, 2018; Kartasasmita, 2014; Setiyono, 2015; Tidey, 2018). Resigning to former inhumane practices is in direct conflict with social work values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, apathy, poor acknowledgement of the needs of the poorest of people, and participation in a social mindset in Indonesia that institutions are good for impoverished children or resigning to administrative status quo in favour of earning incentive payments, all dominate current social work administrative practices. Many authors write about how regional administrators of government welfare initiatives have little interest in the welfare of ordinary people (Hatherell and Welsh, 2017; Jakimow, 2018; Kartasasmita, 2014; Setiyono, 2015; Tidey, 2018). Resigning to former inhumane practices is in direct conflict with social work values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%