2005
DOI: 10.1086/428424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiating Power and Narrative in Research: Implications for Feminist Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
129
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
129
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Interviews are inevitably shaped by the circumstances of their telling, since narratives are the outcome of interpersonal relations and situations (Presser 2005;. Whilst autobiography is often considered a spontaneous mode of self-expression, women (especially poor women) have historically been required to give an account of themselves by state organisations (Stanley 2000; Steedman 2000; on accounts, Scott and Lyman 1968).…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interviews are inevitably shaped by the circumstances of their telling, since narratives are the outcome of interpersonal relations and situations (Presser 2005;. Whilst autobiography is often considered a spontaneous mode of self-expression, women (especially poor women) have historically been required to give an account of themselves by state organisations (Stanley 2000; Steedman 2000; on accounts, Scott and Lyman 1968).…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study employs a feminist qualitative methodology that foregrounds gathering rich, complex qualitative data that is sensitive to issues of gender and intersecting power inequalities at all stages of the research process (Fonow and Cook 2005;Naples 2003;Hesse-Biber 2007;Presser 2005;Ramazanoglu and Holland 2002). As outlined in table 1 below, ten in-depth semi-structured individual interviews were conducted, each lasting between one and two hours.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Podobnie jest w przypadku kobiet-badaczek, które jednak wnoszą w proces badania zupełnie inną perspektywę. Stąd też dobrze jest mieć świadomość własnego ulokowania w strukturze społecznej i krytycznie podchodzić do jego wpływu na proces badawczy [McKeganey, Bloor 1991;Presser 2005;Williams, Heikes 1993;Pini, Pease 2013]. Autorka jest tego świadoma i próbuje wyjaśnić czytelnikowi swoje ulokowanie i dać odpowiedź na pytanie, jakie mogłoby mieć ono konsekwencje dla zebranych danych.…”
Section: Metodologia Czyli O Ulokowaniu Badaczki I Badanychunclassified