2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--28699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiating Tensions of Autonomy and Connection in Makerspace Cultures: A Qualitative Examination of a University's Makerspaces

Abstract: design cognition including systematic methods and tools for innovative design with a particular focus on concept generation and design-by-analogy. Her research seeks to understand designers' cognitive processes with the goal of creating better tools and approaches to enhance engineering design. She has authored over 100 technical publications including twenty-three journal papers, five book chapters, and she holds two patents.Dr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University Dr. Robert Nagel is an Associate Profes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The popularity of makerspaces is confounded by the lack of clarity in describing what constitutes the actual act of making which has been intentionally left vague (Tomko, Linsey, Nagel, Watkins, & Aleman, 2017). What is clear in the literature are the descriptions of where making occurs (i.e., makerspaces) and the subsequent maker movement and maker mindset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The popularity of makerspaces is confounded by the lack of clarity in describing what constitutes the actual act of making which has been intentionally left vague (Tomko, Linsey, Nagel, Watkins, & Aleman, 2017). What is clear in the literature are the descriptions of where making occurs (i.e., makerspaces) and the subsequent maker movement and maker mindset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and "What does learning look like?" It is important to recognize that while qualitative research is occurring in university makerspaces (e.g., Tomko et al, 2017;Tomko et al, 2018), quantitative methodologies, such as survey analysis dominate the research regarding experiences within makerspaces. In a review of research on Academic Makerspaces, Rosenbaum and Hartmann (2017) identified only 5 studies that used qualitative methods, one of which used a case study approach to study student experiences in an extracurricular makerspace (O'Connell, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Makerspaces are becoming an increasingly important part of academics in undergraduate engineering programs. As of 2017, 40 of the top 127 highest ranking U.S. colleges and universities had publicly available makerspaces, shifting on-campus resources from traditional machine shops to more high technology, digital design and rapid prototyping spaces 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a study completed at University of Texas at Austin, 72% of students return to makerspaces after their first makerspace experience. Coursework is the most common reason students visit a makerspace for the first time; therefore, it is important that undergraduate engineering courses incorporate makerspaces into their curriculum to ensure that all students have equal opportunity to thrive in campus makerspaces 12 . Extracurricular engineering clubs and organizations make use of campus makerspaces quite often.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%