Proceedings of the 3rd International Web Science Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2527031.2527046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiating the web science curriculum through shared educational artefacts

Abstract: The far-reaching impact of the Web on society is widely recognised. The interdisciplinary study of this impact has crystallised in the field of study known as Web Science. However, defining an agreed, shared understanding of what constitutes web science requires complex negotiation and translations of understandings across component disciplines, national cultures and educational traditions. Some individual institutions have already established particular curricula, and discussions in the Web Science Curriculum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study conducts a bottom up examination of these current Web Science related curriculums and resources with the future aim of building a picture of Web Science according to what is taught as Web Science worldwide, in a 'bottom up', reverse engineering fashion. [5] Instead of the curriculum guidelines shaping the curricula, the curricula will be used to shape and develop a set of Web Science curriculum guidelines, which will ultimately be presented in the form of a taxonomy of key topics which are typically taught as part of Web Science programmes.…”
Section: A 'Bottom Up' Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study conducts a bottom up examination of these current Web Science related curriculums and resources with the future aim of building a picture of Web Science according to what is taught as Web Science worldwide, in a 'bottom up', reverse engineering fashion. [5] Instead of the curriculum guidelines shaping the curricula, the curricula will be used to shape and develop a set of Web Science curriculum guidelines, which will ultimately be presented in the form of a taxonomy of key topics which are typically taught as part of Web Science programmes.…”
Section: A 'Bottom Up' Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of the survey, categories A (general) and F (teaching) were excluded although it is recognized that both are relevant to broader discussions of the curriculum. Interim analysis of the responses to the survey were reported to the 2011 Web Science conference [26]. The survey used the WSCC as a starting point for the body of knowledge.…”
Section: Web Science Teaching Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perspectives and understandings of Web Science have also been integrated into established courses, typically as a perspective which demonstrates current theoretical advances and furnishes examples of contemporary practice. A Web Science curriculum categorization exercise has been undertaken [24,25] (Table 1) and collaborations have been formed to define and agree a Web Science curriculum [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was addressed early by contributions such as Riera's [10] and other participants at the first curriculum workshop. A developed structure of the Web Science Subject Categorization was proposed by Vafopoulos in 2011 [16], along with a milestone paper by White et al [18], describing the negotiation of a Web Science curriculum and explaining that "the curriculum itself is the natural manifestation of Web Science, serving to systemize knowledge and share approaches, current trends and future vision, to become the visible and practical part of the deep work in understanding and enhance Web Science". Building on these works, the experience presented here creates an example of a tentative to fragment some fundamental aspects of Web science relevant for a discipline and use them as background for an original pedagogic design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%