2004
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arh082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighbor-stranger discrimination by song in a suboscine bird, the alder flycatcher, Empidonax alnorum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When a territorial intrusion was simulated by the broadcast of a stranger's song, subject males spent more time moving, approached closer to the loudspeaker and, after a shorter latency, engaged in more pursuits of other birds, and produced more calls compared to the playback of a neighbour's song. Thus, skylark males discriminated neighbours' from strangers' songs and displayed a stronger territorial behaviour towards the latter, as has been observed in numerous bird species, such as the European robin Erithacus rubecula (Brindley, 1991), banded wren Thryothorus pleurostictus (Molles and Vehrencamp, 2001), blue grouse Dendragapus obscurus (Falls and McNicholl, 1979) and alder flycatcher Empidonax alnorum (Lovell and Lein, 2004). 90·s of song (the duration of the songs played back) were sufficient for the birds to differentiate the two categories of songs.…”
Section: P<0001mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…When a territorial intrusion was simulated by the broadcast of a stranger's song, subject males spent more time moving, approached closer to the loudspeaker and, after a shorter latency, engaged in more pursuits of other birds, and produced more calls compared to the playback of a neighbour's song. Thus, skylark males discriminated neighbours' from strangers' songs and displayed a stronger territorial behaviour towards the latter, as has been observed in numerous bird species, such as the European robin Erithacus rubecula (Brindley, 1991), banded wren Thryothorus pleurostictus (Molles and Vehrencamp, 2001), blue grouse Dendragapus obscurus (Falls and McNicholl, 1979) and alder flycatcher Empidonax alnorum (Lovell and Lein, 2004). 90·s of song (the duration of the songs played back) were sufficient for the birds to differentiate the two categories of songs.…”
Section: P<0001mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Broadcasts continued throughout the nesting season until the final visit to each study site was completed in mid-July. The effect of ongoing broadcasts on nesting in potential colonists was assumed to be negligible, because passerines (including the closely related Alder Flycatcher [Empidonax alnorum]), have been shown to be minimally responsive to the songs of familiar neighbors once territories are established (Lovell and Lein 2004). We installed broadcast systems at least 200 m apart from one another within what field crew members qualitatively assessed as the most appropriate nesting habitat within a meadow, based on soil moisture or inundation, plant species composition, and vegetation structure.…”
Section: Automated Broadcastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively little is known about NSD in non-learning bird species. Only a few studies have presented evidence for NSD in grouse (Falls and McNicholl 1979), tyrant flycatchers (Lovell and Lein 2004), shearwaters (Mackin 2005), loons (Mager et al 2010), wood hoopoes (Radford 2005) and owls (Hardouin et al 2006). Furthermore, several researchers have suggested the potential occurrence of NSD based on individually specific call characteristics in non-learners (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%