2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10044-020-00948-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighborhood and center difference-based-LBP for face recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, two standards for testing generalized facial recognition are proposed. Experiments of our criteria confirm that our approach is generalizable as compared to a variety of baselines and other cuttingedge technology [14]. A new face recognition descriptor is the orthogonally segmented local binary sequence descriptor (OD-LBP).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Also, two standards for testing generalized facial recognition are proposed. Experiments of our criteria confirm that our approach is generalizable as compared to a variety of baselines and other cuttingedge technology [14]. A new face recognition descriptor is the orthogonally segmented local binary sequence descriptor (OD-LBP).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…HELBP [37] secures the ACC of [88.12%, 97.77% 98.70%] when TG dt = 1:3. HE-ICA [38], None-ICA [38], NCDB-LBPac [39] and NCDB-LBPc [39] secured the ACC of 72.00%, 65.60%, 98.28% and 97.65% on TG dt = 1. The proposed ROM-LBP outstrip ACC of 9 techniques entirely.…”
Section: Yb Datasetmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On YB, 11 techniques are picked and compared with ROM-LBP. The detailed description of these are as follows: 2D-DWT+LBP [33], 2D-DWT+HELBP [35] NA NA NA 92.00 MWEE-C [36] N/A N/A N/A 99.80 MEESRC [36] N/A N/A N/A 96.50 HQ [36] N/A N/A N/A 95.70 MBP [24] N/A N/A 52.75 N/A 6x6 MB-LBP [24] N/A N/A 69.25 N/A ELBP [24] N ACC in % 2D-DWT+LBP [33] N/A N/A N/A 93.66 2D-DWT+HELBP [33] N/A N/A N/A 93.66 2D-DWT+MBP [33] N/A N/A N/A 92.50 LC-LBP [24] N/A N/A N/A 85.16 MRELBP-NI [24] N/A N/A N/A 93.00 tLBP [24] N/A N/A N/A 88.66 HELBP [37] 88.12 97.77 98.70 N/A HE-ICA [38] 72.00 N/A N/A N/A None-ICA [38] 65.60 N/A N/A N/A NCDB-LBPac [39] 98.28 N/A N/A N/A NCDB-LBPac [39] 97.65 N/A N/A N/A ROM-LBP 92.18 99.21 99.67 100 NA-Not Available [33], 2D-DWT+MBP [33], LC-LBP [24], MRELBP-NI [24] and tLBP [24] attain the ACC of 93.66%, 93.66%, 92.50%, 85.16%, 93.00% and 88.66% when TG dt = 5. HELBP [37] secures the ACC of [88.12%, 97.77% 98.70%] when TG dt = 1:3.…”
Section: Yb Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LBP technique, was proposed in [13] for texture description and has the advantage of being robust and simple. LBP continues to be used for face recognition as it gives very good results compared to other techniques, while it has improved its performance many times over [14]. Moreover, with the increasing use of machine learning techniques, researchers have integrated algorithms such as LBP and ensemble ad boosted strategy to achieve accurate results in face recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%