2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-011-0100-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighborhood Eating and Activity Advocacy Teams (NEAAT): engaging older adults in policy activities to improve food and physical environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The training was provided by the researchers in a group setting and emphasized realistic goal setting, development of action plans, and strategic identification of potential allies and resources. Each participant received a community advocacy handbook that included definitions, educational materials, and worksheets that had been developed by the research team and that have been shown to have initial utility in fostering community change in other underserved neighborhoods[8, 31]. All written materials and meetings were bilingual (English, Spanish).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The training was provided by the researchers in a group setting and emphasized realistic goal setting, development of action plans, and strategic identification of potential allies and resources. Each participant received a community advocacy handbook that included definitions, educational materials, and worksheets that had been developed by the research team and that have been shown to have initial utility in fostering community change in other underserved neighborhoods[8, 31]. All written materials and meetings were bilingual (English, Spanish).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research evolved out of previous studies conducted by members of the Healthy Aging Research and Technology Solutions (HARTS) Lab at the Stanford Prevention Research Center. The initial development and testing of the approach occurred in the Neighborhood Eating and Activity Advocacy Teams study [8, 9], which spurred the development and testing of the Discovery Tool[10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although full deployment of the community advocacy training portion of the citizen science community engagement model was beyond the scope of this pilot study, 30 participants from one neighborhood were invited to a community meeting to identify issues relating to addressing barriers to active living in their neighborhoods and to discuss how relevant changes could be made in Mexico. The research assistant invited all participants from the low SES/low walkability neighborhood to participate in the community meeting, which took place at the main offices of the National Public Health Institute in Cuernavaca.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…New methods of cost-efficient data collection are needed that can generate local, relevant data to foster community-focused planning and policy solutions. 7 Unfortunately, tools used to assess active living environments are often insufficient for informing local-level change: they are often cumbersome and can require intensive training 8,9 ; self-report measures often are not correlated with objective measures 10 ; GIS-based measures are often inaccessible, and microscale data unavailable to identify specific community needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%