2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighborhood effects and social behavior: The case of irrigated and rainfed farmers in Bohol, the Philippines

Abstract: a b s t r a c tArtifactual field experiments, spatial econometrics, and household surveys are combined in a single study to investigate the neighborhood effects of social behaviors. The dictator and public goods games are conducted among rice farmers in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in the Philippines. We find the neighborhood effects but the magnitude and statistical significance of endogenous social effects vary with the irrigation availability, type of social behavior, and type of neighborhood. Altruist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
36
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance between plots is calculated from the GPS coordinates collected in the 2010 survey. In addition, we need to carefully consider spatial interdependence in both the dependent variables and error terms (e.g., Anselin, 1988;LeSage & Pace, 2009;Tsusaka, Kajisa, Pede, & Aoyagi, 2015). In our context, the former can be interpreted as the learning effect among vicinal ordinary farmers, while the latter is regarded as the resemblance in adoption behavior arising from common unobservable conditions such as soil quality and water availability due to the proximity of the sample plots.…”
Section: Estimation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance between plots is calculated from the GPS coordinates collected in the 2010 survey. In addition, we need to carefully consider spatial interdependence in both the dependent variables and error terms (e.g., Anselin, 1988;LeSage & Pace, 2009;Tsusaka, Kajisa, Pede, & Aoyagi, 2015). In our context, the former can be interpreted as the learning effect among vicinal ordinary farmers, while the latter is regarded as the resemblance in adoption behavior arising from common unobservable conditions such as soil quality and water availability due to the proximity of the sample plots.…”
Section: Estimation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such indigenous beliefs and practices have contributed to NRM systems. It is worth emphasizing that traditional institutions play an important role in ensuring that violators are punished, as illustrated by Tsusaka et al [42]. Collective management of these natural resources is predicated on religions, beliefs, morality, norms and cultural practices.…”
Section: Implications Of the Findings For Natural Resources Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original sampling target was 418 irrigable households randomly selected from each irrigation water user group (approximately 12.3% of the total farm households in the irrigated area) and 429 randomly selected households from adjacent villages that were similar to the irrigated area in terms of hydrology, agronomy and socio-economics. Note that all sample households are rice farmers and that rice has been the dominant crop on the island, often cultivated twice a year even before the project was 3 See Japan International Cooperation Agency and International Rice Research Institute (2012) and Tsusaka et al (2015) for details.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Japan International Cooperation Agency and International Rice Research Institute () and Tsusaka et al . () for details. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%