Neighborhood Governance Reform and Networks of Community Power in Los Angeles

Abstract

This article applies network theory to consider the effects of neighborhood council reform on city governance in Los Angeles. The authors argue that neighborhood councils have the potential to change elite-dominated governance through several network effects: development of bridging social capital—network relationships that cross-cut traditional community cleavages, broadening of horizontal networks that improve information required for collective action, and creation of newties that elevate previously peripheral groups in the system of political communication. Based on field research and a network survey of neighborhood council board members, the authors find that although bonding ties help facilitate collective action, they also maintain social stratification because they develop between similar groups and involve status seeking. The development of weaker bridging ties among more diverse groups appears to promote mobilization through information sharing. Thus, bonding and bridging ties appear to play complementary roles in promoting information dissemination and mobilization among neighborhood councils.

The effects of boundary spanners on trust and performance of urban governance networks: findings from survey research on urban development projects in the Netherlands

“…People focus on activities inside their own group, which creates holes in the information flow between groups, or more simply, structural holes" (Burt 2004: 353). In their study of neighborhood governance reforms in Los Angeles, Musso et al (2006) note that bridging ties increases the reachability of information between individuals and could create more and shorter paths between groups.…”

The Quest for Good Urban Governance

“…This Chapter considers the range of instrumental aims articulated by system participants, and argues that ultimately attainment of these goals necessitates the development of network governance structures that engage participants in collective action and serve as mediating institutions that engage neighborhood stakeholders and serve as channels of information between community members and city agents (Bogason and Musso, 2006;Musso et al, 2006). In particular, it interrogates three thematic areas.…”

The workings of collaborative governance: Evaluating collaborative community-building initiatives in Korea

“…Neighborhood-level committees and leaders, for example, may play significant roles in connecting and creating network ties within and beyond the local community (Musso et al, 2006).…”