2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighborhood isolation in Chicago: Violent crime effects on structural isolation and homophily in inter-neighborhood commuting networks

Abstract: Urban sociologists and criminologists have long been interested in the link between neighborhood isolation and crime. Yet studies have focused predominantly on the internal dimension of social isolation (i.e., increased social disorganization and insufficient jobs and opportunities). This study highlights the need to assess the external dimension of neighborhood isolation, the disconnectedness from other neighborhoods in the city. Analyses of Chicago’s neighborhood commuting network over twelve years (2002-201… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the effects of urban environment characteristics, socio-economic conditions, and mobility have been empirically tested separately 9 , 49 , 60 62 , to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to support with large-scale data the association of crime with socio-economic conditions, the built environment, and mobility. However, we find that these aspects do not play the same role across cities, and only some of them contribute to the crime prediction model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the effects of urban environment characteristics, socio-economic conditions, and mobility have been empirically tested separately 9 , 49 , 60 62 , to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to support with large-scale data the association of crime with socio-economic conditions, the built environment, and mobility. However, we find that these aspects do not play the same role across cities, and only some of them contribute to the crime prediction model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This connectivity is not only influenced by distance but also by geographical barriers, roads, traffic, and public transportation. Moreover, it could be interpreted as a proxy of spatial mismatch and isolation, which was empirically found to be connected with crime 60 . To build the connectivity matrix we use the TimeGeo model, which simulates a reliable Origin-Destination matrix between regions and it is validated towards transportation surveys (see Supplementary Note 3.1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the neighborhood isolation explanation has relied on the implicit assumption that social interactions are limited to one’s neighborhood of residence ( 11 , 12 ). In an increasingly interconnected and mobile society, this assumption is questionable ( 13 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, studies relevant to this fundamental question have relied on three types of data. First, studies have examined commuting ties, which focuses on adults’ travel between home and work ( 12 , 16 ). However, commuting does not include neighborhoods experienced through leisure, errand activities, or visits to friends and family, all of which affect the extent of isolation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mears and Bhati (2006), for instance, found that the crime rates of compositionally homophilous neighborhoods are associated (regardless of proximity), inferring that mobility-based ties among these neighborhoods drive their correlated outcomes. In one of the few studies that empirically examines the consequences of indirect exposures, Graif, Lungeanu, and Yetter (2017) found evidence that the crime rates of places to which neighborhood residents commute are associated with focal neighborhood crime. These studies suggest that aggregate links in the eco-network have consequences for the experience of any given location, regardless of an individual's own exposures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%