2016
DOI: 10.1111/febs.13943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighboring phosphoSer‐Pro motifs in the undefined domain of IRAK1 impart bivalent advantage for Pin1 binding

Abstract: The peptidyl prolyl isomerase Pin1 has two domains that are considered to be its binding (WW) and catalytic (PPIase) domains, both of which interact with phosphorylated Ser/Thr-Pro motifs. This shared specificity might influence substrate selection, since many known Pin1 substrates have multiple sequentially close phosphoSer/Thr-Pro motifs, including the protein IRAK1. The IRAK1 undefined domain (UD) contains two sets of such neighboring motifs (Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173), suggesting possible bivalent in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the binding affinity was determined using a four-state model (free [ 15 N]EVH1, only primary site bound, only secondary site bound, and both primary and secondary sites bound) as previously described. 36 For all four peptides, this analysis yielded relatively weak affinities for the primary binding site and considerably weaker affinities for the secondary site (Table 1). These affinities are mostly weaker than the previously reported values for the same M1 P –M4 P peptides (74 μ M, 61 μ M, 197 μ M, and no binding observed, respectively) determined by Trp fluorescence spectroscopy and fitted to a two-state model (free and 1:1 bound).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the binding affinity was determined using a four-state model (free [ 15 N]EVH1, only primary site bound, only secondary site bound, and both primary and secondary sites bound) as previously described. 36 For all four peptides, this analysis yielded relatively weak affinities for the primary binding site and considerably weaker affinities for the secondary site (Table 1). These affinities are mostly weaker than the previously reported values for the same M1 P –M4 P peptides (74 μ M, 61 μ M, 197 μ M, and no binding observed, respectively) determined by Trp fluorescence spectroscopy and fitted to a two-state model (free and 1:1 bound).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Fitting of the binding data for six residues in the primary and six residues in the secondary binding surface to this model yields an apparent K d value of 32.2 ± 1.7 μ M (Figure 2E). The goodness of fit, evaluated by a χ 2 analysis as described in detail elsewhere, 36 yielded a reduced χ 2 value of 4.19. This χ 2 value is consistent with the two-state bivalent model being an oversimplification, as expected because the population distribution determined above indicates that multiple bound species are sampled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As MAPK family members, activation of the MAPK kinase (MEK)1/2-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 signaling pathway involves significant modifications in the emergence and development of the myocardial fibrotic process, by interacting with and phosphorylating protein kinases and transcription factors. It is known that protein phosphorylation is a critical process consisting of complex signaling cascades, which mediate protein structure and folding ( 8 , 9 ) and exert a profound effect on pathophysiological cardiac conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, indicating that these sites are not sensitive to the configuration of this assay or that they do not undergo much cis-trans isomerization. Although singly phosphorylated S290 could be isomerized by Pin1, it is highly unlikely due to bivalency requirements for Pin1 binding/isomerization (Daum et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2012;Eichner et al, 2016;Rogals et al, 2016). Furthermore, a mutant containing both sets of mutations (N3A/C2A) behaved just like the N3A-PSD-95 mutant ( Figures 4K,M, left bar graph).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%