2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.04123.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighbour-stranger song discrimination in territorial ortolan bunting Emberiza hortulana males

Abstract: Neighbour-stranger discrimination has been demonstrated in many species, but the mechanisms employed in discrimination vary. We tested whether an oscine bird with small repertoire size, the ortolan bunting Emberiza hortulana , discriminated between songs of neighbours and strangers. We performed playback experiments to measure response of males to a repeated single example of a single song type derived from a repertoire of a neighbour or stranger. Thirteen males were tested twice each, and in both cases songs … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences involved both approach and vocal responses, and the males' behaviour was similar to the pattern found when natural neighbour and stranger songs were used for playback (Skierczyński et al. ; Skierczyński & Osiejuk ). These results therefore support the hypothesis that the variation of frequency of initial song phrases in shared song types is perceived by males and is used in N‐S discrimination (Osiejuk et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences involved both approach and vocal responses, and the males' behaviour was similar to the pattern found when natural neighbour and stranger songs were used for playback (Skierczyński et al. ; Skierczyński & Osiejuk ). These results therefore support the hypothesis that the variation of frequency of initial song phrases in shared song types is perceived by males and is used in N‐S discrimination (Osiejuk et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…These results suggest that the individual acoustic cue that is used for N‐S discrimination is encoded in some song characteristics that are not directly (or solely) related to song‐type repertoire (Skierczyński et al. ; Skierczyński & Osiejuk ). Such individual non‐repertoire cues seem to be especially necessary in populations in which individual male repertoires are small and song types are strongly shared by neighbours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In all three experiments, we simulated intrusion into an owner territory with a playback of a stranger rival. These simulations reflect natural agonistic situations and evoked strong responses in the study species (e.g., Osiejuk et al., ; Skierczyński et al., ). If a soft song is a signal of aggressive intent, then we should expect—according to the context criterion—more soft songs produced in a more aggressive context (Searcy & Beecher, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A typical response to an intruder consists of approaching the rival, ceasing the singing and starting the calling (e.g., Osiejuk, Ratyńska, & Dale, , 2007b). Males can discriminate among rivals with different threat values, for example neighbour vs. stranger, and flexibly adjust their responses (Osiejuk, ; Skierczyński, Czarnecka, & Osiejuk, ; Skierczyński & Osiejuk, ). Low‐amplitude songs have been observed during such male–male interactions and are known to share the same structure as broadcast songs, but sometimes low‐amplitude songs can be slightly shortened (Conrads, ; Jakubowska, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other experimental studies have addressed questions related to dialect function and mechanisms of dialect recognition (Pellerin 1983;Hansen 1984;Baker et al 1987;Osiejuk et al 2007a). The other aspects of song behaviour that have been investigated are territorial defence (Kreutzer & Güttinger 1991;Nemeth 1996;Osiejuk et al 2007b;Suter et al 2009, neighbour-stranger recognition (Hansen 1984Osiejuk et al 2007a, b;Skierczyński et al 2007;Skierczyński and Osiejuk 2010) and male-female communication (Nemeth 1994;Wingelmaier et al 2007). However, in these studies, ornithologists have focussed on just five common European species: Corn Buntings, E. calandra; Ortolan Buntings, E. hortulana; Yellowhammers, E. citrinella; Cirl Buntings, E. cirlus; and Reed Buntings, E. schoeniclus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%